[Evaluation of tools for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines on sexually transmitted infections].

Item request has been placed!

Item request cannot be made.

Processing Request

Read More Add to Saved list

Author(s): Moreno JHR;Moreno JHR; Romero Vergara AJ; Romero Vergara AJ; De Moya DJA; De Moya DJA; Jaramillo Rojas HJ; Jaramillo Rojas HJ; Díaz Rojas CM; Díaz Rojas CM; Ciapponi A; Ciapponi A
Source:
Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health [Rev Panam Salud Publica] 2017 May 25; Vol. 41, pp. e49. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 May 25.
Publication Type:
Evaluation Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study
Language:
Spanish; Castilian

Additional Information
- Transliterated Title:
  Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual.
- Source:
  Publisher: Pan American Health Organization Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9705400 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1680-5348 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10204989 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Rev Panam Salud Publica Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
  Original Publication: Washington, D.C. : Pan American Health Organization, [1997?-
- Subject Terms:
  Guideline Adherence/*statistics & numerical data ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases/*therapy; Colombia ; Humans
- Abstract:
  Objective: Determine the acceptability, perceived usefulness, and adoption of implementation tools and technical assistance provided by the Health Technology Assessment Institute (IETS) in hospitals in two regions of Colombia.
  Methods: Assistance was provided for implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in 24 hospitals (17 in Antioquia and seven in Cundinamarca) in areas with high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections, and for use of the implementation tools. Health professionals were given surveys and medical specialists were interviewed.
  Results: Overall, 86% of respondents are familiar with the GPGs, 86% with the tracer recommendations, 79% with the interactive flow charts, and 82% with the evidence sheets, while 41% never used the implementation tools. Of the respondents who used the tools, 55% did so on their work computer, while 24% used their personal telephone. The most useful tools were the evidence sheets and flow charts (98%) and the tracer recommendations (92%). The least useful were the budgetary impact tools (81%).
  Conclusions: The implementation tools and technical assistance provided in hospitals in two regions of Colombia are perceived as useful and acceptable, although the degree of implementation is low. The findings of this research will help the different actors, such as the Ministry of Health and Social Protection, the IETS, and the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (Colciencias), among others, improve their programs for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
- References:
  Biomedica. 2002 Mar;22(1):77-88. (PMID: 11957369)
  Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. (PMID: 20957426)
  Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012 Jan;13(1):48-59. (PMID: 22008308)
  Endocr Pract. 2015 Nov;21(11):1255-68. (PMID: 26247114)
- Publication Date:
  Date Created: 20170608 Date Completed: 20180517 Latest Revision: 20220317
- Publication Date:
  20240104
- Accession Number:
  PMC6612726
- Accession Number:
  28591335

Comments

No Comments.