A Stepping Stone Toward Necessary Change: How the New USMLE Step 1 Scoring System Could Affect the Residency Application Process.

Publisher: Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8904605 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1938-808X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10402446 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Acad Med Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: Philadelphia, PA : Published for the Association of American Medical Colleges by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: [Philadelphia, Pa. : Hanley & Belfus, c1989-

Education, Medical, Undergraduate* ; Internship and Residency* ; Licensure, Medical*; Educational Measurement/*methods; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Humans ; Personnel Selection ; United States

Score reporting for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 will change from a 3-digit number to pass/fail as soon as January 1, 2022. The shift is meant to prevent residency program directors from using Step 1 scores to select applicants for interviews, a purpose for which the exam was not designed. Using Step 1 scores in this way also has put undue stress on medical students applying to residency. However, the score reporting change represents only one stepping stone toward an improved transition from undergraduate to graduate medical education. To enable a more reliable and holistic review of applicants, residency program directors and medical school administrators must promote other standardized evaluation tools and address the hypercompetitive and frenzied state of the residency application process. For example, medical schools should provide program directors with assessments of students' fit and readiness for residency that are not burdensome to understand and compare. In addition, residency programs should implement "traffic rules" to improve the interview process for applicants. These changes will significantly mitigate the burden on all stakeholders. As residents who recently experienced this transition, the authors of this Invited Commentary argue that now is the opportune time to redefine selection criteria and reemphasize the characteristics that truly matter in training competent future physicians.

United States Medical Licensing Examination. InCUS—Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring. Change to pass/fail score reporting for Step 1. https://www.usmle.org/inCus. Accessed April 28, 2020.
Sharma A, Schauer DP, Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Sall D, Warm E. USMLE Step 2 CK: Best predictor of multimodal performance in an internal medicine residency. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11:412–419.
Hartman ND, Lefebvre CW, Manthey DE. A narrative review of the evidence supporting factors used by residency program directors to select applicants for interviews. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11:268–273.
Deng F, Chen JX, Wesevich A. More transparency is needed to curb excessive residency applications. Acad Med. 2017;92:895–896.
Chen JX, Deng F, Gray ST. Preference signaling in the National Resident Matching Program. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144:951.

Date Created: 20200515 Date Completed: 20201119 Latest Revision: 20210505

20240105

10.1097/ACM.0000000000003501

32404607