Abstract: From the perspective of institutional isomorphism, the adoption of corporate governance practices during the years 2008 to 2014 was studied in 105 companies registered in the Colombia´s National Registry of Securities and Issuers (RNVE). No evidence was found to claim that there is isomorphism in this adoption. These results may be due to the short time that the Country Code has been enacted (seven years). Being a short study period to reflect significant changes in the variation of the Corporate Governance Index Country Code (IGCCP) in Colombia. It was validated that the tendency toward homogenization in the adoption of corporate governance practices is different in family versus non-family businesses. ; Desde la perspectiva del isomorfismo institucional fue estudiada la implementación de prácticas de gobierno corporativo durante los años 2008 a 2014 en 105 empresas inscritas en el Registro Nacional de Valores y Emisores (RNVE) de Colombia. No se encontró evidencia para afirmar que en dicha implementación exista isomorfismo. Estos resultados pueden deberse al poco tiempo que tiene de promulgado el Código País (siete años), siendo un periodo de estudio corto para reflejar cambios significativos en la variación del índice de Gobierno Corporativo Código País (IGCCP) en Colombia. Se validó que la tendencia hacia la homogeneización en la implementación de prácticas de gobierno corporativo es diferente en las empresas familiares frente a las no familiares. ; A partir da perspectiva do isomorfismo institucional foi estudada a implementação de práticas de governo corporativo durante os anos 2008 a 2014 em 105 empresas inscritas no Registro Nacional de Valores e Emissores (RNVE) da Colômbia. Não se encontrou evidência para afirmar que em dita implementação exista isomorfismo. Estes resultados podem ser devido ao pouco tempo que tem de promulgado o Código País (sete anos), sendo um período de estudo curto para refletir mudanças significativas na variação do índice de Governo Corporativo Código País (IGCCP) na Colômbia. Validou-se que a tendência para a homogeneização na implementação de práticas de governo corporativo é diferente nas empresas familiares frente às não familiares.
Relation: http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/1832/2608; http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/1832/2631; http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/1832/3097; http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/1832/3098; Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54 (3): 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280; Aguilera, R. & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.; Barbesta, A., Giudici, G., & Lugo, S. (2010). Mimetic isomorphism in the governance of IPO companies in Italy. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8 (1A): 117–122. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i1p10; Bremer, J., Hegazy, M., & Sabri, A. (2011). Improving audit committee performance in the Middle East: do Egyptian audit profession norms support international standards? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 6(3): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2011.043239; Claessens, S. (2006). Corporate governance and development. The World Bank Research Observer, 21 (1): 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkj004; De Lima, L., Oliveira, M., Ponte, V. & Rebouças, S. (2016). Práticas de governança corporativa adotadas e divulgadas pelos fundos de pensão brasileiros. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 12(27): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2015v12n27p3; Dias Filho, J., & Moura, F. (2013). Evidenciações de Cunho Social em seis Bancos Brasileiros – Uma análise à luz da Teoria Institucional. Revista Universo Contábil, 9 (3): 6–21. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2013319; Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLII (2): 115–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950485; Fligstein, N. (1993). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.; Gallo, M. (1995). Empresa familiar: texto y casos. Barcelona: Estudios y Ediciones IESE.; Gómez-Betancourt, G. (2010). ¿Cómo construir un legado familiar? Un modelo para tener familias empresarias perdurables. México: Cengage Learning.; Gómez-Betancourt, G., López, V., Betancourt, R. & Millán, P. (2012). Estudio sobre el desempe-o de las empresas familiares colombianas que cotizan en la bolsa de valores, frente a las empresas no familiares. Entramado, 8(1), 28–42.; Gunathilake, W. & Chandrakumara, P. (2010). Why do corporations accept voluntary codes on corporate governance and why is theacceptance so rapid among the corporations? A theoretical explanation. British Academy of Management (pp. 1-25). Sheffield:University of Sheffield; Holder-Webb, L., & Cohen, J. (2012). The cut and paste society: Isomorphism in codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 107 (4): 485–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1060-1; Lagos, C. D., & Vecino, A. C. E. (2014). Influencia del gobierno corporativo en el costo de capital proveniente de la emisión de deuda. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(130), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.02.010; Maseda, A., Arosa, B., & Iturralde, T. (31 de Julio de 2015). Familia empresaria y empresa familiar: estructuras de gobierno. Disponible en: http://www.ehu.eus/documents/2819611/2882007/Familia_empresaria_y_empresa_familiar.pdf.; Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2): 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550; Moura, A., Magalhães, S., Aquino, A., & Santos, S. (2014). Corporate Governance under the perspective of isomorphism: A BMFBOVESPA banking industry approach. Revista de Gestão, Finanças E Contabilidade, 4(3): 23–44.; Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2): 384–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667000; Petrakis, P. (1997). Entrepreneurship and growth: creative and equilibrating events. Small Business Economics, 9 (5): 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007980925402; Powell, W., & Dimaggio, P. (1991). Retorno a la jaula de hierro: el isomorfismo institucional y la racionalidad colectiva en los campos organizacionales. En: W. Powell y P. Dimaggio (Eds.), El nuevo institucionalismo en el análisis organizacional. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.; Riaz, Z., Ray, S., Ray, P. K., & Kumar, V. (2015). Disclosure practices of foreign and domestic firms in Australia. Journal of World Business, 50 (4): 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.04.001; San Martin-Reyna, J., & Duran-Encalada, J. (2012). The relationship among family business, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the Mexican stock exchange. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(2): 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.03.001; Suess, J. (2014). Family governance–Literature review and the development of a conceptual model. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5 (2): 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.02.001; Superintendencia de Valores. (2001). Resolución 275 de 2001. Disponible en: https://www.superfinanciera.gov.co/jsp/loader.jsf?lServicio=Publicaciones&lTipo=publicaciones&lFuncion=loadContenidoPublicacion&id=821&dPrint=1; Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia (2007). Código de mejores prácticas corporativas. Disponible en: https://www.superfinanciera.gov.co/SFCant/Codigopais/textos/codigopias.pdf.; Thorsell, A., & Cornelius, B. (2009). Coercion, Copy-Cats, and Colleagues: Staffing the Board of the IPO Company. Corporate Ownership and Control, 7 (1): p.105. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv7i1p10; Whetten, D. (1987). Organizational growth and decline processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002003; Zakaria, I. (2012). Performance measures, benchmarks and targets in executive remuneration contracts of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 44 (3): 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2012.07.005; http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/1832
_0.png)
Processing Request
No Comments.