Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA): Timelines Analysis and Policy Implications

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Frontiers Media S.A.
    • Publication Date:
      2019
    • Collection:
      PubMed Central (PMC)
    • Abstract:
      This analysis follows our recent study showing that Canadian public reimbursement delays have lengthened from regulatory approval to listing decisions by public drug plans and delayed public access to innovative medicines, mainly due to processes following the Common Drug Review (CDR) and the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR). Public drug plans participate in a pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) joint negotiation process before making decisions about whether or not to reimburse a product reviewed through CDR and pCODR. This research aims to report the findings from a comprehensive analysis of pCPA process times, times to reimbursement by public payers in Canada, and to explore the opportunities to reduce total delays in public reimbursement with a specific focus on the pCPA process. An analysis was conducted of pCPA timelines with respect to making decisions about products and indications reviewed through CDR/pCODR, and focusses on three separate time components: time to begin negotiating, time spent negotiating, and time to implement the negotiation (i.e., time to list) in each of nine jurisdictions (i.e., 10 provinces of Canada, excluding Quebec). This study demonstrates the role of post-CDR/pCODR processes in large and lengthening delays to listing new medicines. Notably, oncology products have experienced the longest increases in time to begin negotiating and to complete negotiations. Trends in listing times post-pCPA across provinces are less clear, however, it appears that consistency in terms of timelines across provinces is not happening quite so smoothly for oncology products compared to non-oncology products. Listing rates also appear to be declining for non-oncology products, although this trend is less conclusive for oncology products. Challenges need to be addressed to improve efficiency, transparency, and ultimately reduce pCPA timelines and total timelines to public reimbursement. Suggested ways to improve and streamline the listing process are: (1) transparent target timelines ...
    • Relation:
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387957/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833899; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01578
    • Accession Number:
      10.3389/fphar.2018.01578
    • Online Access:
      https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01578
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6387957/
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833899
    • Rights:
      Copyright © 2019 Salek, Lussier Hoskyn, Johns, Allen and Sehgal. ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.C32E80F7