Abstract: This paper analyzes the translation policies of the Argentinean magazines Diario de Poesía, Xul, Hablar de Poesía, and El Banquete. Translation has a central role there as an area of dispute and construction of genealogies, poetic definitions, setting of affinities and differences, not only considering the poets translated, but the bio-bibliographic reviews, essays, interviews and literary criticism that surrounds it. Thus, these journals are a privileged space for discussion about the canon and the configuration of new poetic sub-canons, while encouraging certain positions respecting the figure of the poet and the work on poetic language. They outline spaces, orientations and tendencies, hegemonic or not, in the cultural field of a given moment, making possible emergencies, oblivions, dissidence, that are fundamental to poetic work, as an essential theoretical environment for writing and circulating of poetry in more than one language.
No Comments.