In ovo sexing and genotyping using PCR techniques: a contribution to the 3R principles in chicken breeding.

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE; In Process

Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Bahr, J. M. in Sourcebook of Models for Biomedical Research (ed P. Michael Conn) 161–167Humana Press, (2008).
Beacon, T. H. & Davie, J. R. The chicken model organism for epigenomic research. Genome 64, 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2020-0129 (2021). (PMID: 10.1139/gen-2020-012933232179)
Kaplan-Arabaci, O., Dančišinová, Z. & Paulsen, R. E. The Chicken Embryo: An Alternative Animal Model in Development and Disease. Heliyon (2024). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4724622.
Burt, D. W. Emergence of the chicken as a model organism: implications for agriculture and biology. Poult. Sci. 86, 1460–1471. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.7.1460 (2007). (PMID: 10.1093/ps/86.7.146017575197)
Stern, C. D. The chick; a great model system becomes even greater. Dev. Cell. 8, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.11.018 (2005). (PMID: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.11.01815621526)
Sarnella, A. et al. The Chicken Embryo: An Old but Promising Model for In Vivo Preclinical Research. Biomedicines 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122835.
Davey, M. G. & Tickle, C. The chicken as a model for embryonic development. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 117, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103184 (2007). (PMID: 10.1159/00010318417675864)
Gruber, F. P. & Hartung, T. Alternatives to animal experimentation in basic research. ALTEX (2004).
Davey, M. G. M., Mike, J., Holmes & Tana A Scientific Case for Revisiting the Embryonic Chicken Model in Biomedical Research. SSRN (2024). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5012603.
Weiss, L. et al. Nocicepton in chicken embryos, Part I: Analysis of cardiovascular responses to a mechanical noxious stimulus. Anim. (Basel). 13. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.14.536899 (2023).
Kollmansperger, S. et al. Nociception in chicken embryos, Part II: Embryonal development of electroencephalic neuronal activity in ovo as a prerequisite for nociception. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.14.536947 (2023). (PMID: 10.1101/2023.04.14.536947)
Süß, S. C. et al. Nociception in chicken embryos, Part III: Analysis of movements before and after application of a noxious stimulus. Animals 13 https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.20.537674 (2023).
Bruijnis, M. R. N., Blok, V., Stassen, E. N. & Gremmen, H. G. J. Moral Lock-In in Responsible Innovation: The Ethical and Social Aspects of Killing Day-Old Chicks and Its Alternatives. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 28, 939–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9566-7 (2015). (PMID: 10.1007/s10806-015-9566-7)
Corion, M. et al. Trends in in ovo sexing technologies: insights and interpretation from papers and patents. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00898-1 (2023). (PMID: 10.1186/s40104-023-00898-13745237810347793)
Xu, S. et al. Egg characteristics assessment as an enabler for in-ovo sexing technology: A review. Biosyst. Eng. 249, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2024.11.008 (2025). (PMID: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2024.11.008)
Di Concetto, A., Morice, O. & Corion, M. & Monteiro Belo dos Santos, S. Chick and Duckling Killing: Achieving an EU-Wide Prohibition (European Institute for Animal Law & Policy, 2023).
Code rurale de la pêche maritime; Partie réglemetaire. Journal officiel de la République française, Livre, I. I. & Chapitre, I. V. Section  2, Sous-Sect.  1, R214-217 (2022).
Code rurale de la pêche maritime; Partie réglementaire Journal officiel de la République française, Livre, I. I. & Chapitre, I. V. Section  4, Sous-Sect.  3, R214-278 (modifié par Décret n°2022-2137-Art.2021) (2022).
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act. London Gazette, c. 14 (2013). (1986).
(German Animal Welfare Act & Tierschutzgesetz ). BGBl. I, S 1826, § 4c (2021).
Animal Welfare Regulation Governing Experimental Animals (TierSchVerV). BGBl. I S. 1308, Sect.  2, § 14. (2024).
Bacon, L. D., Hunt, H. D. & Cheng, H. H. A review of the development of chicken lines to resolve genes determining resistance to diseases. Poult. Sci. 79, 1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1082 (2000). (PMID: 10.1093/ps/79.8.108210947175)
Ballantyne, M. et al. Direct allele introgression into pure chicken breeds using Sire Dam Surrogate (SDS) mating. Nat. Commun. 12, 659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20812-x (2021). (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-020-20812-x335101567844028)
Lengyel, K. et al. Unveiling the critical role of androgen receptor signaling in avian sexual development. Nat. Commun. 15, 8970. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52989-w (2024). (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-024-52989-w3941998411487053)
Jansen, S. et al. Relationship between Bone Stability and Egg Production in Genetically Divergent Chicken Layer Lines. Anim. (Basel). 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050850 (2020).
Henderson, L., Okuzaki, Y., Marcelle, C., McGrew, M. J. & Nishijima, K. I. Avian bioresources for developmental biology: Chicken and quail resources in the United Kingdom, France, and Japan. Dev. Biol. 521, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2025.02.001 (2025). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2025.02.00139904408)
Milchevskaya, V. et al. Group size planning for breedings of gene-modified mice and other organisms following Mendelian inheritance. Lab. Anim. (NY). 52, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-023-01213-1 (2023). (PMID: 10.1038/s41684-023-01213-13748841010393774)
Buch, T. et al. Reducing surplus experimental animal generation. Lab. Anim. 56, 305–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772221096054 (2022). (PMID: 10.1177/0023677222109605435686742)
Wewetzer, H., Wagenknecht, T., Bert, B. & Schonfelder, G. The fate of surplus laboratory animals: Minimizing the production of surplus animals has greatest potential to reduce the number of laboratory animals. EMBO Rep. 24, e56551. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202256551 (2023). (PMID: 10.15252/embr.202256551367151659986809)
Morinha, F. et al. High-resolution melting analysis for bird sexing: a successful approach to molecular sex identification using different biological samples. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12081 (2013). (PMID: 10.1111/1755-0998.1208123433263)
Cordeiro, C. D. et al. Fast, accurate, and cost-effective poultry sex genotyping using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Front. Vet. Sci. 10, 1196755. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1196755 (2023). (PMID: 10.3389/fvets.2023.11967553802663010655105)
He, L. et al. Simple, sensitive and robust chicken specific sexing assays, compliant with large scale analysis. PLoS One. 14, e0213033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213033 (2019). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213033308223306396912)
Rosenthal, N. F. et al. High-throughput applicable genomic sex typing of chicken by TaqMan real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Poult. Sci. 89, 1451–1456. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00638 (2010). (PMID: 10.3382/ps.2010-0063820548072)
Clinton, M., Haines, L., Belloir, B. & McBride, D. Sexing chick embryos: a rapid and simple protocol. Br. Poult. Sci. 42, 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/713655025 (2001). (PMID: 10.1080/71365502511337963)
Jensen, T., Mace, M. & Durrant, B. Sexing of mid-incubation avian embryos as a management tool for zoological breeding programs. Zoo Biol. 31, 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20433 (2012). (PMID: 10.1002/zoo.2043322105526)
V.D. Hofstadt, M. et al. Molecular sexing of chick embryos by LAMP and RPA assays: a step toward in ovo egg sexing. PREPRINT (Version 1) available Res. Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5772672/v1 (2025). (PMID: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5772672/v1)
Weissmann, A., Reitemeier, S., Hahn, A., Gottschalk, J. & Einspanier, A. Sexing domestic chicken before hatch: a new method for in ovo gender identification. Theriogenology 80, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.04.014 (2013). (PMID: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.04.01423726296)
Weissmann, A. et al. In ovo-gender identification in laying hen hybrids: Effects on hatching and production performance. Europ Poult. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2014.25 (2014). (PMID: 10.1399/eps.2014.25)
Turkyilmaz, M. K., Karagenc, L. & Fidan, E. Sexing of newly-hatched chicks using DNA isolated from chorio-allantoic membrane samples by polymerase chain reaction in Denizli chicken. Br. Poult. Sci. 51, 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.502521 (2010). (PMID: 10.1080/00071668.2010.50252120924847)
Seleggt. PLANTegg. Accessed October 28, (2025). https://www.plantegg.de /.
Monteiro Belo Santos, S., Corion, M., De Ketelaere, B., Lammertyn, J. & Spasic, D. Allantoic Fluid-Based qPCR for Early Onset In Ovo Sexing. J. Agric. Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c09418 (2024). (PMID: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c0941838613504)
Respeggt. Accessed October 28, (2025).
Jia, N. et al. A Review of Key Techniques for in Ovo Sexing of Chicken Eggs. Agriculture 13 https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030677 (2023).
Xie, C., Tang, W. & Yang, C. A review of the recent advances for the in ovo sexing of chicken embryos using optical sensing techniques. Poult. Sci. 102, 102906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102906 (2023). (PMID: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.1029063748065610393812)
Woodcock, M. E. et al. Reviving rare chicken breeds using genetically engineered sterility in surrogate host birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 20930–20937 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906316116.
Panda, S. K. & McGrew, M. J. Genome editing of avian species: implications for animal use and welfare. Lab. Anim. 56, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677221998400 (2022). (PMID: 10.1177/002367722199840033691522)
Percie du Sert. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 (2020). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411326632217360025)
Percie du Sert. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 (2020). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410326632197360023)
Mangir, N., Dikici, S., Claeyssens, F. & MacNeil, S. Using ex Ovo Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assay To Evaluate the Biocompatibility and Angiogenic Response to Biomaterials. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 3190–3200. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00172 (2019). (PMID: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0017233405582)
Cloney, K. & Franz-Odendaal, T. A. Optimized ex-ovo culturing of chick embryos to advanced stages of development. J. Vis. Exp. 52129 https://doi.org/10.3791/52129 (2015).
Hamburger & Hamilton A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88(1): 49–92. (1951).
Hosono, S. et al. Unbiased whole-genome amplification directly from clinical samples. Genome Res. 13, 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.816903 (2003). (PMID: 10.1101/gr.81690312695328430878)
Dean, F. B. et al. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 5261–5266 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082089499.
Suriyaphol, G., Kunnasut, N., Sirisawadi, S., Wanasawaeng, W. & Dhitavat, S. Evaluation of dried blood spot collection paper blotters for avian sexing by direct PCR. Br. Poult. Sci. 55, 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.925087 (2014). (PMID: 10.1080/00071668.2014.92508724875666)
Bailes, S. M., Devers, J. J., Kirby, J. D. & Rhoads, D. D. An Inexpensive, Simple Protocol for DNA Isolation from Blood for High-Throughput Genotyping by Polymerase Chain Reaction or Restriction Endonuclease Digestion. Poult. Sci. 86, 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.1.102 (2007). (PMID: 10.1093/ps/86.1.10217179422)
Dierks, C., Altgilbers, S., Weigend, A., Preisinger, R. & Weigend, S. Sexing assay for chickens and other birds for large-scale application based on a conserved sequence variant in CHD1 genes on W and Z chromosomes. Anim. Genet. 53, 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13176 (2022). (PMID: 10.1111/age.1317635130358)
Fridolfsson, A. K. & Ellegren, H. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J. Avian Biol. 30, 116–121 (1999). (PMID: 10.2307/3677252)
Wragg, D. et al. Endogenous retrovirus EAV-HP linked to blue egg phenotype in Mapuche fowl. PLoS One. 8, e71393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071393 (2013). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071393239909503747184)
Altgilbers, S., Dierks, C., Klein, S., Weigend, S. & Kues, W. A. Quantitative analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated provirus deletion in blue egg layer chicken PGCs by digital PCR. Sci. Rep. 12, 15587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19861-7 (2022). (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-022-19861-7361142669481566)
Tona, K. et al. Effects of egg storage time on spread of hatch, chick quality, and chick juvenile growth. Poult. Sci. 82, 736–741. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.5.736 (2003). (PMID: 10.1093/ps/82.5.73612762394)
Boerjan, M. L. in Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews.4 edn 237–238.
Chen, L. et al. Dynamic 3D morphology of chick embryos and allantois depicted nondestructively by 3.0T clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Poult. Sci. 102, 102902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102902 (2023). (PMID: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.1029023742905110466300)
Baggott, G. K. Development of Extra-embryonic Membranes and Fluid Compartments. Avian Biol. Res. 2, 21–26 (2009). (PMID: 10.3184/175815509X430381)
Simkiss, K. Water and Ionic Fluxes inside the Egg. Am. Zool. 20, 385–393 (1980). (PMID: 10.1093/icb/20.2.385)
Everaert, N., Willemsen, H., Willems, E., Franssens, L. & Decuypere, E. Acid-base regulation during embryonic development in amniotes, with particular reference to birds. Respir Physiol. Neurobiol. 178, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2011.04.023 (2011). (PMID: 10.1016/j.resp.2011.04.02321569866)
Rideout, B. A. Investigating embryo deaths and hatching failure. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Exot Anim. Pract. 15, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2012.02.005 (2012). (PMID: 10.1016/j.cvex.2012.02.00522640533)
Romanoff, A. L. Critical Periods and Causes of Death in Avian Embryonic Development. Auk 66, 264–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/4080357 (1949). (PMID: 10.2307/4080357)
Martinez-Rodero, I. et al. Blastocoel fluid aspiration improves vitrification outcomes and produces similar sexing results of in vitro-produced cattle embryos compared to microblade biopsy. Theriogenology 218, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.042 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.04238325151)
Powers, L. & Huntersville, N. (2021).
Zendehboudi, M. & Vesal, N. Comparison of cardiopulmonary effects of propofol, ketamine-propofol and isoflurane anesthesia in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus). Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 51, 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.005 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.00539142984)
Horr, M., Sommerfeld, S., Silva, M. V. & Fonseca, B. B. A fast and simple protocol to anaesthesia in chicken embryos. Exp. Anim. 72, 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.22-0133 (2023). (PMID: 10.1538/expanim.22-01333664254010435353)
Zumbrink, L., Brenig, B., Foerster, A., Hurlin, J. & Wenzlawowicz, M. v. Electrical anaesthesia of male chicken embryos in the second third of the incubation period in compliance with animal welfare. Eur. Poult. Sci. 84, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2020.315 (2020). (PMID: 10.1399/eps.2020.315)
Aleksandrowicz, E. & Herr, I. Ethical euthanasia and short-term anesthesia of the chick embryo. ALTEX 32, 143–147. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1410031 (2015). (PMID: 10.14573/altex.141003125592390)
Hatt, J. M., Kreyenbuhl, K. & Kummrow, M. [Methods of analgesia and euthanasia in backyard poultry]. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 165, 503–511. https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00398 (2023). (PMID: 10.17236/sat0039837403590)
Schlegel, L., Kleine, A. S., Doherr, M. G. & Fischer-Tenhagen, C. How to see stress in chickens: On the way to a Stressed Chicken Scale. Poult. Sci. 103, 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103875 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.1038753887874411234025)
Dierks, C., Simianer, N. T. H. H., Cavero, D. & Preisinger, R. S. Weigend. in 70th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, 26–30 August. (ed Scientific Committee). (ed Scientific Committee). (2019).
Dierks, C., Simianer, N. T. H. H., Andersson, B., Cavero, D. & Preisinger, R. S. Weigend. in XI European Symposium on Poultry Genetics, 23–25 October 2019. (ed S. Weigend P. Trefil).

Keywords: in ovo genotyping; in ovo sexing; 3R principles; KASP

Date Created: 20260221 Latest Revision: 20260226

20260226

PMC12929762

10.1038/s41598-026-40562-y

41723204