Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
Functional hearing and low frequency hearing preservation after cochlear implant surgery is achievable with FLEX electrode arrays: Real world evidence from the MEHS Registry.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
This study uses data from the MED-EL Hearing Solutions (MEHS) multicenter registry to examine the impact of a series of flexible lateral wall electrode arrays on postoperative low frequency hearing preservation (LFHP) of cochlear implant (CI) users. Participants were members of the MEHS registry who had received a MED-EL CI with a FLEX electrode array. LFHP was evaluated using 2 formulae: the Vienna Consensus (VC), which assesses hearing preservation at 250‒1000 Hz; and the Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO), which assesses hearing preservation at 125‒500 Hz. LFHP was assessed via air conduction preoperatively and between 6 and 36 months postoperatively. LFHP was achievable with all the FLEX arrays evaluated, regardless of length. With the VC, 60% of ears (n = 95) had complete or partial LFHP at 6‒12 months postoperatively and 68.4% (n = 19) had complete or partial LFHP at 24‒36 months postoperatively. With the AAO, 43.4% of ears (n = 83) had LFHP at 6‒12 months postoperatively and 84.2% (n = 19) had functional low frequency residual hearing at 24‒36 months postoperatively. In conclusion, implantation with FLEX electrode arrays can preserve functional low-frequency residual hearing up to three years after implantation. The MEHS multicenter registry appears to be a valuable tool for collecting large amounts of real-world data from CI users despite challenges in harvesting usable data.
(Copyright: © 2026 Baumann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Abstract:
Authors Ilona Anderson, Stefano Morettini, Karin Koinig, and Magdalena Breu are employed at MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte G.m.b.H. Uwe Baumann and Daniel Polterauer-Neuling have received travel support & research support from MED-EL GmbH (Austria). Polterauer-Neuling is part of MED-EL’s audiological scientific advisory board (MAUWIB). Other authors disclose no conflict of interest. Commercial affiliation does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20260417 Date Completed: 20260417 Latest Revision: 20260419
- Publication Date:
20260419
- Accession Number:
PMC13089756
- Accession Number:
10.1371/journal.pone.0345295
- Accession Number:
41996338
No Comments.