Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Competence and paternalism.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): DeMarco JP;DeMarco JP
- Source:
Bioethics [Bioethics] 2002 Jun; Vol. 16 (3), pp. 231-45.
- Publication Type:
Journal Article
- Language:
English
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8704792 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0269-9702 (Print) Linking ISSN: 02699702 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Bioethics
- Publication Information:
Publication: Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Oxford ; New York : Basil Blackwell, c1987-
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Some bioethicists have argued in favor of a sliding scale notion of competence, paternalistically requiring greater competence in relation to more significant risk. I argue against a sliding scale notion, taking issue with the positions of Allen E. Buchanan and Dan W. Brock, Ian Wilkes, and Joel Feinberg. Rejecting arguments that a sliding scale is supported by legal cases, by ordinary usage, and by fallible judgments about competence, I argue in favor of greater evidence of competence when risk is greater. Two clinical cases are examined, both involving amputation, to show that my fixed concept of competence, with a requirement of clearer evidence of competence when risk is high, better accounts for good moral decisions in bioethics.
- Contributed Indexing:
Indexing Agency: KIE Local ID #: 103409.
Keywords: Analytical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
Note: 30 fn. Note: KIE Bib: treatment refusal
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20020905 Date Completed: 20020909 Latest Revision: 20221207
- Publication Date:
20240513
- Accession Number:
10.1111/1467-8519.00283
- Accession Number:
12211247
No Comments.