Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Teacher resistance to engage with ‘alternative’ perspectives of difficult histories: the limits and prospects of affective disruption.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Zembylas, Michalinos (AUTHOR)
  • Source:
    Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Oct2017, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p659-675. 17p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      This paper discusses teacher resistance to recognizing some perspectives of difficult histories. The paper focuses on the following question: How does affect contribute not only to the formation of teacher resistance, but also to its disruption in ways that enable the productive reclaiming of teachers’ engagement with traumatic histories? To address this question, the paper first revisits the notion of difficult knowledge, highlighting its affective dimensions and its relevance to teacher resistance. Then, it argues that the role of affect in resistance demands a different way of conceptualizing ‘teacher resistance’ to acknowledge how affect is entangled with both the micro- and macro-political dimensions of resistance. In the light of this reconceptualized notion of teacher resistance, the paper theorizes the notion of ‘affective disruption’ by using Judith Butler's social theory. Finally, the notion of ‘pedagogy of discomfort’ is revisited to demonstrate the new openings created by a reconceptualized notion of teacher resistance in the context of teacher professional learning. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)