Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

A PROPÓSITO DEL DEVENGO DE LA CUOTA VARIABLE DEL AJD EN LA TRANSMISIÓN DE ESTABLECIMIENTOS MERCANTILES. ¿ES EL REGISTRO DE BIENES MUEBLES UN VERDADERO REGISTRO DE TITULARIDADES? (Spanish)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      In relation with the accrual of variable Stamp Duty on the transfer of business premises. Is the Personal Property Registry a true registry of ownership? (English)
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The Third Chamber of the Spanish Supreme Court has adopted a broad interpretation of the nature of the Personal Property Registry (Registro de Bienes Muebles), considering it a register of ownership for all purposes. This means that, from a tax perspective, variable Stamp Duty (Impuesto sobre Actos Jurídicos Documentados) may accrue when public deeds are executed that transfer movable property that may be registrable. However, in our opinion, the approach adopted by the Supreme Court may not fit with the regulations governing the Personal Property Registry as they have been interpreted by the Directorate-General for Legal Certainty and Public Faith. In this article we analyse statements issued by the Supreme Court, the applicable registry regulations and the possible effects of this landmark taxation case, in particular on the accrual of variable Stamp Duty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      La interpretación extensiva que ha adoptado la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo acerca de la naturaleza del Registro de Bienes Muebles en el sentido de considerarlo un registro de titularidades a todos los efectos conlleva que, desde la perspectiva fiscal, pueda plantearse el devengo de la cuota variable del Impuesto sobre Actos Jurídicos Documentados con el otorgamiento de escrituras públicas que contengan la transmisión de bienes muebles que puedan considerarse registrables. Sin embargo, en nuestra opinión, el criterio adoptado por el Tribunal Supremo podría no encajar con la normativa reguladora del Registro de Bienes Muebles según ha sido interpretada por la Dirección General de Seguridad y Fe Pública. Analizamos en el presente artículo los pronunciamientos emitidos por el Tribunal Supremo, la normativa registral aplicable y los posibles efectos de esta jurisprudencia en el ámbito tributario y, en particular, en el devengo de la cuota variable del Impuesto sobre Actos Jurídicos Documentados. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X) is the property of Dykinson SL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)