Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis - A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study).

Background and Aims: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the clot. This in vitro study compared the techniques of performing the EC-assisted EBP using 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe on clotting time (CT), clot retraction (CR) and haemolysis. Methods: This in vitro study was performed in a haematology laboratory. Five consented adult healthy male volunteers donated blood. In the 5-ml syringe technique, blood was injected through an EC, and as it flowed out of the tip, it was collected at the beginning and the end of 1 min. With the 20-ml technique, blood was collected at the beginning and end of the first, second and third minute. The samples were tested for CT, CR and haemolysis by measuring the plasma-free haemoglobin (PFHb). Results: Five injections were made using a 5-ml syringe, and another five with a 20-ml syringe. Injection time was shorter in the 5-ml technique (80.80 ± 5.89 vs. 272 ± 28.4 s, P < 0.0001). With the 20-ml technique, CT progressively increased (>15 min), whereas, with the 5-ml syringe, the CT was normal. Both techniques caused mild, insignificant haemolysis (PFHb >0.005 g/dl), without affecting the quality of CR. Conclusion: EC-assisted EBP using a 5-ml syringe technique shortens the injection time and deposits fresh blood quickly without affecting CT and CR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Indian Journal of Anaesthesia is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)