Prescription of transdermal patches in Colombia: A real-world evidence study.

STATISTICS; LIDOCAINE; PROFESSIONS; RIVASTIGMINE; ANTILIPEMIC agents; CROSS-sectional method; BUPRENORPHINE; ESTRADIOL; CHRONIC diseases; AGE distribution; TRANSDERMAL medication; RETROSPECTIVE studies; MEDICATION errors; FENTANYL; MANN Whitney U Test; FISHER exact test; SEX distribution; DEMENTIA patients; BENIGN prostatic hyperplasia; INAPPROPRIATE prescribing (Medicine); DRUG prescribing; LEGAL compliance; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; CHI-squared test; PHYSICIAN practice patterns; STATISTICAL sampling

BACKGROUND: Transdermal drug delivery has contributed positively to medical practice. However, prescriptions that do not meet minimum quality criteria and medication errors are common. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine how transdermal patches are being prescribed to a group of patients in Colombia, the compliance with established requirements of such prescriptions and the comparisons between correct and incorrect prescriptions. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of prescriptions for transdermal patches using data from a population-based drug dispensing database between December 1 and 31, 2019. Medical prescriptions were randomly reviewed, establishing whether the drugs were appropriately prescribed by the manufacturer's indications or national regulations. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 415 prescriptions were reviewed; the prescription was provided to 412 patients with a median age of 76.9 years, and 63.3% were women. Rivastigmine was the most prescribed transdermal patch (57.8%). 66.3% of all prescriptions did not meet the minimum appropriate prescribing standards, especially those for rivastigmine (97.1%). The 7.0% of all prescriptions had posology errors, especially prescriptions for buprenorphine (43.8%). Older patients (84.4% vs 52.5%), from the Pacific region (34.4% vs 23.7%), with manual formulations (22.1% vs 0.8%), dementia (49.0% vs 6.8%), and in management with lipid-lowering drugs (41.8% vs 30.5%), presented incorrect transdermal patch formulations more frequently (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The high proportion of inappropriately prescribed transdermal patches should draw the attention of those responsible for health care to improve the training of physicians and create prescription quality verification systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine is the property of IOS Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)