Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
Exploring the Binding Mechanism of ADGRG2 Through Metadynamics and Biochemical Analysis.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
- Author(s): Zhang, Chao1 (AUTHOR) ; Zhang, Ru1 (AUTHOR) ; Qi, Yuanyuan1 (AUTHOR) ; Wen, Xin1,2 (AUTHOR) ; Sun, Jinpeng1,2 (AUTHOR) ; Xiao, Peng1,2 (AUTHOR)
- Source:
International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Jan2025, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p167. 21p.
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Abstract:
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play essential roles in numerous physiological processes and are key targets for drug development. Among them, adhesion GPCRs (aGPCRs) stand out for their unique domain structures and diverse functions. ADGRG2 is a member of the aGPCR family and is involved in the regulation of various systems in the human body, including reproductive, nervous, cardiovascular, and endocrine systems. Investigating ADGRG2 antagonists enhances our understanding of its regulatory roles in diverse physiological processes, yet their precise mechanisms of action remain unclear. To address this, we investigated the antagonistic mechanism of ADGRG2 by examining its interactions with various antagonists, including short peptides (F601D, F601E) and small molecules (deoxycorticosterone, DOC). Using advanced metadynamics simulation, ligand binding assay and cAMP assay, we elucidated the binding modes of these antagonists. We identified five distinct F601D-ADGRG2 complex states, four F601E-ADGRG2 complex states, and three DOC-ADGRG2 complex states, which were each characterized by specific hydrogen bonds or polar interactions with their respective ligands. Although the ADGRG2 binding pocket consists of both polar and hydrophobic residues, our biochemical experiments revealed that mutations in polar amino acids significantly reduce the efficacy of the antagonists. Our results show that F601D, F601E, and DOC induce the formation of Y758ECL2-N7755.32-N8607.46 polar networks within ADGRG2, effectively stabilizing its inactive state. Additionally, we compared the active and inactive states of ADGRG2, highlighting the structural changes induced by antagonist-stabilized polar networks and their impact on receptor conformation. These findings provide important insights into the biology of aGPCRs and provide theoretical support for the rational design of therapeutic drugs targeting ADGRG2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
No Comments.