КАНОН АТИЧКИХ БЕСЕДНИКА У ИСТОРИЈИ ХЕЛЕНСКЕ КЊИЖЕВНОСТИ МИЛОША Н. ЂУРИЋА ˗ ПРИМЕР ЕСХИНА (Serbian)

THE CANON OF THE ATTIC ORATORS IN MILOŠ N. ĐURIĆ'S HISTORY OF THE ANCIENT GREEK LITERATURE - THE EXAMPLE OF AESCHINES. (English)

In this paper, we devoted special attention to the chapter of Đurić's History of Ancient Greek Literature that deals with oratory, with a particular focus on Đurić's critical analysis and interpretation of Aeschines' rhetorical and political engagement. In doing so, we also briefly presented some of our own observations regarding Đurić's understanding of the essence and significance of oratory--not only within the context of the ancient world, but also in its influence on the modern age. Researching this issue inevitably implies different readings of the rhetorical text -- philological as well as ethical -- which is precisely the case in Đurić's aforementioned work. Therefore, the aim of Đurić's interpretation was not only to provide a brief overview of the rhetorical engagement of Attic rhetors, but also to place their activity in a broader social and political context, enabling a better understanding of their actions and influence, as well as the ethical and psychological elements present in their speeches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Милош Н. Ђурић у својој Историји хеленске књижевности пружа систематичан преглед развоја и основних одлика беседништва, као и друштвено-политичког ангажмана десеторице атичких беседника, који су припадали чувеном реторском Канону. У овом раду посебну пажњу посветићемо поглављу из Ђурићеве Историје хеленске књижевности у којем се разматра наведена проблематика, а у чијим оквирима ћемо настојати да анализирамо и протумачимо Ђурићев однос према беседничком стваралаштву, његовој суштини и намени, као и етосној и психолошкој компоненти присутној у говорима атичких беседника. Као основ за нашу анализу послужиће нам Ђурићев приказ Есхиновог беседничког и друштвено-политичког ангажмана. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Annual Review of the Faculty of Philosophy / Godisnjak Filozofskog Fakulteta is the property of Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)