Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
The intrepid urban coyote: a comparison of bold and exploratory behavior in coyotes from urban and rural environments.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Coyotes (Canis latrans) are highly adaptable, medium-sized carnivores that now inhabit nearly every large city in the United States and Canada. To help understand how coyotes have adapted to living in urban environments, we compared two ecologically and evolutionarily important behavioral traits (i.e., bold-shy and exploration-avoidance behavior) in two contrasting environments (i.e., rural and urban). Boldness is an individual's reaction to a risky situation and exploration is an individual's willingness to explore novel situations. Our results from both tests indicate that urban coyotes are bolder and more exploratory than rural coyotes and that within both populations there are individuals that vary across both spectrums. Bolder behavior in urban coyotes emerged over several decades and we speculate on possible processes (e.g., learning and selection) and site differences that could be playing a role in this behavioral adaptation. We hypothesize that an important factor is how people treat coyotes; in the rural area coyotes were regularly persecuted whereas in the urban area coyotes were rarely persecuted and sometimes positively rewarded to be in close proximity of people. Negative consequences of this behavioral adaptation are coyotes that become bold enough to occasionally prey on pets or attack humans.
- References:
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):372-8. (PMID: 16701288)
J Theor Biol. 2007 Jan 7;244(1):59-67. (PMID: 16949619)
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):291-318. (PMID: 17437562)
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):20-9. (PMID: 18173498)
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):935-56. (PMID: 20569253)
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Aug;86(3):640-57. (PMID: 20977599)
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Nov;9(11):442-6. (PMID: 21236920)
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Aug;27(8):452-61. (PMID: 22727728)
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 17;8(4):e60590. (PMID: 23613732)
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Sep;19(9):2634-44. (PMID: 23681984)
Primates. 2013 Oct;54(4):309-14. (PMID: 23760536)
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Jan;51(1):265-8. (PMID: 25380355)
Evol Appl. 2011 Mar;4(2):367-87. (PMID: 25567979)
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 7;282(1802):null. (PMID: 25608884)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 7;114(45):E9589-E9597. (PMID: 29078308)
Ecol Appl. 2018 Apr;28(3):786-797. (PMID: 29676861)
Ecol Evol. 2018 Dec 11;8(24):12965-12980. (PMID: 30619597)
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20190216 Date Completed: 20200925 Latest Revision: 20200925
- Publication Date:
20250114
- Accession Number:
PMC6376053
- Accession Number:
10.1038/s41598-019-38543-5
- Accession Number:
30765777
No Comments.