Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Preconception diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes in over 6.4 million women: A population-based cohort study in China.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101231360 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1549-1676 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15491277 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science, [2004]-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Professor Huixia Yang is a guest editor for the Maternal and Child Health & Nutrition Special Issue.
      Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, and optimization of glycemic control during pregnancy can help mitigate risks associated with diabetes. However, studies seldom focus precisely on maternal blood glucose level prior to pregnancy. We aimed to evaluate the associations between preconception blood fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.
      Methods and Findings: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study among 6,447,339 women aged 20-49 years old who participated in National Free Pre-Pregnancy Checkups Project and completed pregnancy outcomes follow-up between 2010 and 2016 in China. During the preconception health examination, serum FPG concentration was measured, and self-reported history of DM was collected. Women were classified into three groups (normal FPG group: FPG < 5.6 mmol/L and no self-reported history of DM; impaired fasting glucose [IFG]: FPG 5.6-6.9 mmol/L and no self-reported history of DM; and DM: FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or self-reported history of DM). The primary outcomes were adverse pregnancy outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, preterm birth (PTB), macrosomia, small for gestational age infant (SGA), birth defect, and perinatal infant death. Logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) after adjusting for confounding variables. The mean age of women was 25.24 years, 91.47% were of Han nationality, and 92.85% were from rural areas. The incidence of DM and IFG was 1.18% (76,297) and 13.15% (847,737), respectively. Only 917 (1.20%) women reported a history of DM (awareness of their DM status), of whom 37.28% (337) had an elevated preconception FPG level (≥ 5.6 mmol/L), regarded as noncontrolled DM. A total of 1,005,568 (15.60%) women had adverse pregnancy outcomes. Compared with women with normal FPG, women with IFG had higher risks of spontaneous abortion (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.06-1.09; P < 0.001), PTB (1.02; 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001), macrosomia (1.07; 1.06-1.08; P < 0.001), SGA (1.06; 1.02-1.10; P = 0.007), and perinatal infant death (1.08; 1.03-1.12; P < 0.001); the corresponding ORs for women with DM were 1.11 (95% CI 1.07-1.15; P < 0.001), 1.17 (1.14-1.20; P < 0.001), 1.13 (1.09-1.16; P < 0.001), 1.17 (1.04-1.32; P = 0.008), and 1.59 (1.44-1.76; P < 0.001). Women with DM also had a higher risk of birth defect (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.91; P = 0.002). Among women without self-reported history of DM, there was a positive linear association between FPG levels and spontaneous abortion, PTB, macrosomia, SGA, and perinatal infant death (P for trend <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, 0.001, <0.001). Information about hypoglycemic medication before or during pregnancy was not collected, and we cannot adjust it in the analysis, which could result in underestimation of risks. Data on 2-hour plasma glucose level and HbA1c concentration were not available, and the glycemic control status was evaluated according to FPG value in women with DM.
      Conclusions: Women with preconception IFG or DM had higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, PTB, macrosomia, SGA, and perinatal infant death. Preconception glycemic control through appropriate methods is one of the most important aspects of preconception care and should not be ignored by policy makers.
    • References:
      J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Apr;101(4):1807-15. (PMID: 26918293)
      Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Aug;2(8):e451-2. (PMID: 25103517)
      Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):31-40. (PMID: 21705069)
      Nature. 2001 Dec 13;414(6865):782-7. (PMID: 11742409)
      Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Jun;45(2):315-331. (PMID: 29747733)
      Diabetes Metab. 2016 Apr;42(2):122-5. (PMID: 26718735)
      Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Jan 20;95(3):162-5. (PMID: 25877024)
      Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-82. (PMID: 20190296)
      Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131 Suppl 3:S173-211. (PMID: 26433807)
      Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271-281. (PMID: 29496507)
      Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Oct;3(10):795-804. (PMID: 26355010)
      Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):768-73. (PMID: 20067968)
      BMJ. 2016 Sep 13;354:i4694. (PMID: 27624087)
      Diabetes Care. 2017 Feb;40(2):e16-e18. (PMID: 27899491)
      JAMA. 2009 May 27;301(20):2129-40. (PMID: 19470990)
      Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S4-S5. (PMID: 27979887)
      Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Dec;2(12):930-1. (PMID: 25218730)
      JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):948-59. (PMID: 24002281)
      Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jun;5(6):e624-e632. (PMID: 28495266)
      Diabetes Care. 2010 Dec;33(12):2514-20. (PMID: 21115765)
      Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e523-e536. (PMID: 28341117)
      JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1811-1819. (PMID: 31087027)
      Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2008 Sep;9(3):203-11. (PMID: 18661241)
      Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):124-30. (PMID: 25936235)
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Blood Glucose)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20191002 Date Completed: 20200204 Latest Revision: 20200204
    • Publication Date:
      20250114
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6771981
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pmed.1002926
    • Accession Number:
      31574092