Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Influence of Soldiers' Cardiorespiratory Fitness on Physiological Responses and Dropouts During a Loaded Long-distance March.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 2984771R Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1930-613X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00264075 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Mil Med Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE; MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2018- : Oxford : Oxford University Press
      Original Publication: Washington, D.C. : Association of Military Surgeons, United States, 1955-
    • Abstract:
      Introduction: In military service, marching is an important, common, and physically demanding task. Minimizing dropouts, maintaining operational readiness during the march, and achieving a fast recovery are desirable because the soldiers have to be ready for duty, sometimes shortly after an exhausting task. The present field study investigated the influence of the soldiers' cardiorespiratory fitness on physiological responses during a long-lasting and challenging 34 km march.
      Materials and Methods: Heart rate (HR), body core temperature (BCT), total energy expenditure (TEE), energy intake, motivation, and pain sensation were investigated in 44 soldiers (20.3 ± 1.3 years, 178.5 ± 7.0 cm, 74.8 ± 9.8 kg, body mass index: 23.4 ± 2.7 kg × m-2, peak oxygen uptake ($\dot{\rm{V}}$O2peak): 54.2 ± 7.9 mL × kg-1 × min-1) during almost 8 hours of marching. All soldiers were equipped with a portable electrocardiogram to record HR and an accelerometer on the hip, all swallowed a telemetry pill to record BCT, and all filled out a pre- and post-march questionnaire. The influence of aerobic capacity on the physiological responses during the march was examined by dividing the soldiers into three fitness groups according to their $\dot{\rm{V}}$O2peak.
      Results: The group with the lowest aerobic capacity ($\dot{\rm{V}}$O2peak: 44.9 ± 4.8 mL × kg-1 × min-1) compared to the group with the highest aerobic capacity ($\dot{\rm{V}}$O2peak: 61.7 ± 2.2 mL × kg-1 × min-1) showed a significantly higher (P < .05) mean HR (133 ± 9 bpm and 125 ± 8 bpm, respectively) as well as peak BCT (38.6 ± 0.3 and 38.4 ± 0.2 °C, respectively) during the march. In terms of recovery ability during the break, no significant differences could be identified between the three groups in either HR or BCT. The energy deficit during the march was remarkably high, as the soldiers could only replace 22%, 26%, and 36% of the total energy expenditure in the lower, middle, and higher fitness group, respectively. The cardiorespiratory fittest soldiers showed a significantly higher motivation to perform when compared to the least cardiorespiratory fit soldiers (P = .002; scale from 1 [not at all] to 10 [extremely]; scale difference of 2.3). A total of nine soldiers (16%) had to end marching early: four soldiers (21%) in the group with the lowest aerobic capacity, five (28%) in the middle group, and none in the highest group.
      Conclusion: Soldiers with a high $\dot{\rm{V}}$O2peak showed a lower mean HR and peak BCT throughout the long-distance march, as well as higher performance motivation, no dropouts, and lower energy deficit. All soldiers showed an enormous energy deficit; therefore, corresponding nutritional strategies are recommended.
      (© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021.)
    • References:
      Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2019 Mar 1;29(2):130-140. (PMID: 30943823)
      Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Feb;51(2):241-7. (PMID: 2305711)
      Sports Med. 2014 May;44 Suppl 1:S25-33. (PMID: 24791914)
      Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011 Sep;301(3):R832-41. (PMID: 21697517)
      Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012 Sep;7(3):251-60. (PMID: 22357753)
      Mil Med. 2015 Mar;180(3):329-36. (PMID: 25735025)
      Mil Med. 2011 May;176(5):494-9. (PMID: 21634292)
      Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Sep;38(9):947-52. (PMID: 23905660)
      Nutrients. 2014 Nov 10;6(11):4935-60. (PMID: 25389897)
      Appetite. 2013 Apr;63:92-104. (PMID: 23274127)
      Mil Med. 2010 Nov;175(11):858-64. (PMID: 21121495)
      Adv Physiol Educ. 2015 Sep;39(3):139-48. (PMID: 26330029)
      Clin J Sport Med. 2003 May;13(3):157-63. (PMID: 12792210)
      J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29 Suppl 11:S178-86. (PMID: 26506185)
      J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Nov;21(11):1116-1124. (PMID: 29886134)
      Exp Physiol. 2011 Sep;96(9):822-8. (PMID: 21602295)
      J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Jul 1;125(1):229-232. (PMID: 29420148)
      Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6 Suppl):S364-9; discussion S419-20. (PMID: 11427761)
      Sports Med. 2003;33(1):33-46. (PMID: 12477376)
      Mil Med. 2014 Jan;179(1):49-55. (PMID: 24402985)
      Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Sep;34(5):327-39. (PMID: 24237859)
      Br J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;41(3):126-33. (PMID: 17178778)
      Int J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;33(9):716-22. (PMID: 22706943)
      Mil Med. 2014 Feb;179(2):218-24. (PMID: 24491620)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20220111 Latest Revision: 20250708
    • Publication Date:
      20250708
    • Accession Number:
      PMC10363014
    • Accession Number:
      10.1093/milmed/usab540
    • Accession Number:
      35015894