Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Residual efficacy of selected larvicides against Culex pipiens pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory and semi-field conditions.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9441769 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1614-7499 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09441344 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: <2013->: Berlin : Springer
      Original Publication: Landsberg, Germany : Ecomed
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Mosquitoes are a threat worldwide since they are vectors of important pathogens and parasites such as malaria, dengue, yellow fever, and West Nile. The residual toxicity of several commercial mosquito larvicides was evaluated for the control of Culex pipiens pipiens under controlled laboratory and semi-field conditions during late spring and summer of 2013. The evaluation included six different active ingredient formulations, i.e., diflubenzuron Du-Dim), Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) (Vectobac), spinosad (Mozkill), S-methoprene (Biopren), temephos (Abate), and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (Aquatain), that are currently registered of and had been registered in the past for mosquito control. Under controlled laboratory conditions, the residual activity ranged from 1 week (S-methoprene) up to 2 months (spinosad, PDMS). Exposure of larvicides under semi-field conditions resulted in noticeable differences regarding their efficacy as compared to the laboratory bioassays. Exposure of S-methoprene, Bti, and spinosad, for up to 3 days, resulted in similar adult emergence to the controls. On the other hand, the residual efficacy of diflubenzuron, temephos, and PDMS ranged from 14 to 28 days, depending on the season of exposure. Longevity and fecundity of adults that had emerged from surviving larvae, in most of the cases tested, did not differ significantly from that of the controls. The results of the present study demonstrate the necessity of both field and laboratory studies to draw safe conclusions regarding the efficacy of larvicides against mosquitoes and the selection of the proper formulation for each application scenario. In addition, defining the seasonal variation in the residual toxicity of the tested formulations could be useful for improving mosquitos' management programs.
      (© 2023. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Adak T, Mukherjee I (2016) Investigating role of abiotic factors on spinosad dissipation. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96:125–129. (PMID: 10.1007/s00128-015-1644-z)
      Afrane YA, Mweresa NG, Wanjala CL, Gilbreath TM III, Zhou G, Lee M-C, Githeko AK, Yan G (2016) Evaluation of long-lasting microbial larvicide for malaria vector control in Kenya. Malar J 15:577. (PMID: 10.1186/s12936-016-1626-6)
      Baldacchino F, Caputo B, Chandre F, Drago A, Della Torre A, Montarsi F, Rizzoli A (2015) Control methods against invasive Aedes mosquitoes in Europe: a review. Pest Manag Sci 71:1471–1485. (PMID: 10.1002/ps.4044)
      Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD, Valéro JR (2006) Recent advances in downstream processing and formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis based biopesticides. Process Biochem 41:323–342. (PMID: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.07.015)
      Bruehl CA, Despres L, Frör O, Patil CD, Poulin B, Tetreau G, Allgeier S (2020) Environmental and socioeconomic effects of mosquito control in Europe using the biocide Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (Bti). Sci Total Environ 724:137800. (PMID: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137800)
      Bukhari T, Knols BGJ (2009) Efficacy of Aquatain™, a monomolecular surface film, against the malaria vectors Anopheles stephensi and An. gambiae S.S. in the laboratory. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80:758–763. (PMID: 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.80.758)
      Cilek JE, Aldridge RL, Britch SC, Fajardo JD, Linthicum KJ, Richardson AG (2020) Effectiveness of Aquatain® AMF and Cocobear™ larvicidal oil against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae and pupae in an organically enhanced aquatic habitat. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 36:47–50. (PMID: 10.2987/19-6862.1)
      Ciota AT, Matacchiero AC, Kilpatrick AM, Kramer LD (2014) The effect of temperature on life history traits of Culex mosquitoes. J Med Entomol 51:55–62. (PMID: 10.1603/ME13003)
      Derua YA, Kahindi SC, Mosha FW, Kweka EJ, Atieli HE, Wang X, Zhou G, Lee M-C, Githeko AK, Yan G (2018) Microbial larvicides for mosquito control: impact of long lasting formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus on non-target organisms in western Kenya highlands. Ecol Evol 8:7563–7573. (PMID: 10.1002/ece3.4250)
      Devillers J (2020) Fate and ecotoxicological effects of pyriproxyfen in aquatic ecosystems. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:16052–16068. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-020-08345-8)
      Drago A, Simonato G, Vettore S, Martini S, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Cassini R (2017) Field trial to evaluate two different procedures for monitoring the efficacy of Aquataint against Culex pipiens and Aedes albopictus in catch basins. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 33:318–323. (PMID: 10.2987/17-6682.1)
      Drago A, Simonato G, Vettore S, Martini S, Marcer F, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Cassini R (2020) Efficacy of Aquatain® against Culex pipiens complex and Aedes albopictus in catch basins in Italy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 36:51–54. (PMID: 10.2987/19-6889.1)
      Farajollahi A, Fonseca DM, Kramer LD, Kilpatrick AM (2011) “Bird biting” mosquitoes and human disease: a review of the role of Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes in epidemiology. Infest Gen Evol 11:1577–1585. (PMID: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.013)
      Grigoraki L, Puggioli A, Mavridis K, Douris V, Montanari M, Bellini R, Vontas J (2017) Striking diflubenzuron resistance in Culex pipiens, the prime vector of West Nile virus. Sci Rep 7:11699. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-017-12103-1)
      Hariprasad TPN, Shetty NJ (2017) Sublethal and transgenerational effects of alphamethrin on life history traits of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae), a malaria mosquito. Can Entomol 149:251–264. (PMID: 10.4039/tce.2016.57)
      Hertlein MB, Thompson GD, Subramanyam B, Athanassiou CG (2011) Spinosad: a new natural product for stored grain protection. J Stored Prod Res 47:131–146. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jspr.2011.01.004)
      Kilpatrick AM, Meola MA, Moudy RM, Kramer LD (2008) Temperature, viral genetics, and the transmission of West Nile virus by Culex pipiens Mosquitoes. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000092. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000092)
      Mbare O, Lindsay SW, Fillinger U (2014) Pyriproxyfen for mosquito control: female sterilization or horizontal transfer to oviposition substrates by Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Culex quinquefasciatus. Parasit Vectors 7:1–12. (PMID: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-280)
      Michaelakis A, Papachristos DP, Rumbos CI, Athanassiou CG (2018) Effect of the combined application of the microencapsulated synthetic oviposition pheromone (MSP) with different larvicidal agents of the oviposition of Culex pipiens biotype molestus. Pest Manag Sci 74:392–397. (PMID: 10.1002/ps.4719)
      Michaelakis A, Papachristos DP, Rumbos CI, Benelli G, Athanassiou CG (2020) Larvicidal activity of spinosad and its impact on oviposition preferences of the West Nile vector Culex pipiens biotype molestus- a comparison with a chitic synthesis inhibitor. Parasitol Internat 74:101917. (PMID: 10.1016/j.parint.2019.04.014)
      Msangi S, Lyatuu E, Kweka EJ (2011) Field and laboratory evaluation of bioefficacy of an insect growth regulator (Dimilin) as a larvicide against mosquito and housefly larvae. Am J Trop Med Hyg 394541:8.
      Nikolaidou AJ, Ioannou CS, Papadopoulos NT, Athanassiou CG (2021) Efficacy of polydimethylsiloxane against Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:39614–39624. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-021-13075-6)
      Rumbos CI, Athanassiou CG (2020) Assessment of selected larvicides for the control of Culex pipiens biotype pipiens and Culex pipiens biotype molestus under laboratory and semi-field conditions. Pest Manag Sci 76:3568–3576. (PMID: 10.1002/ps.5847)
      Russell TL, Kay BH (2008) Biologically based insecticides for the control of immature Australian mosquitoes: a review. Aust J Entomol 47:232–242. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2008.00642.x)
      Tran TT, Janssens L, Dinh KV, Stoks R (2018) Transgenerational interactions between pesticide exposure and warming in a vector mosquito. Evol Appl 11:906–917. (PMID: 10.1111/eva.12605)
      Webb CE, Russell RC (2009) A laboratory investigation of the mosquito control potential of the monomolecular film Aquatain® mosquito formula against immature stages of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosquito Contr 25:106–109. (PMID: 10.2987/08-5750.1)
      Webb CE, Russell RC (2012) Does the monomolecular film Aquatain® mosquito formula provide effective control of container-breeding mosquitoes in Australia? J Am Mosquito Contr 28:53–58. (PMID: 10.2987/11-6193.1)
      WHO [World Health Organization] (1981) Instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae to insecticides. WHO/VBC/81.807.
      WHO [World Health Organization] (2013) Lymphatic filariasis: a handbook of practical entomology for national lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes. WHO/HTM/NTD/PCT/2013.10. https://www.who.int/lymphatic_filariasis/resources/9789241505642/en/.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Bti; Control; Diflubenzuron; Larvicides; Mosquitoes; Polydimethylsiloxane; S-methoprene; Spinosad; Temephos
    • Accession Number:
      ONP3ME32DL (Temefos)
      0 (Insecticides)
      J76U6ZSI8D (Diflubenzuron)
      8B830OJ2UX (Methoprene)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20230110 Date Completed: 20230405 Latest Revision: 20240628
    • Publication Date:
      20240628
    • Accession Number:
      PMC10067649
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s11356-022-24654-6
    • Accession Number:
      36626059