Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Engaging communities as partners in health crisis response: a realist-informed scoping review for research and policy.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Corporate Authors:
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101170481 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1478-4505 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14784505 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Res Policy Syst Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2003-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Health is increasingly affected by multiple types of crises. Community engagement is recognised as being a critical element in successful crisis response, and a number of conceptual frameworks and global guideline documents have been produced. However, little is known about the usefulness of such documents and whether they contain sufficient information to guide effective community engagement in crisis response. We undertake a scoping review to examine the usefulness of conceptual literature and official guidelines on community engagement in crisis response using a realist-informed analysis [exploring contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes(CMOs)]. Specifically, we assess the extent to which sufficient detail is provided on specific health crisis contexts, the range of mechanisms (actions) that are developed and employed to engage communities in crisis response and the outcomes achieved. We also consider the extent of analysis of interactions between the mechanisms and contexts which can explain whether successful outcomes are achieved or not.
      Scope and Findings: We retained 30 documents from a total of 10,780 initially identified. Our analysis found that available evidence on context, mechanism and outcomes on community engagement in crisis response, or some of their elements, was promising, but few documents provided details on all three and even fewer were able to show evidence of the interactions between these categories, thus leaving gaps in understanding how to successfully engage communities in crisis response to secure impactful outcomes. There is evidence that involving community members in all the steps of response increases community resilience and helps to build trust. Consistent communication with the communities in time of crisis is the key for effective responses and helps to improve health indicators by avoiding preventable deaths.
      Conclusions: Our analysis confirms the complexity of successful community engagement and the need for strategies that help to deal with this complexity to achieve good health outcomes. Further primary research is needed to answer questions of how and why specific mechanisms, in particular contexts, can lead to positive outcomes, including what works and what does not work and how to measure these processes.
      (© 2024. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):944. (PMID: 29228932)
      Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Nov;118(11):1507-14. (PMID: 20576580)
      Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jan;16(1):e1-e9. (PMID: 26526664)
      BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 28;3(1):e000758. (PMID: 29527354)
      Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Apr 28;14:1731-1747. (PMID: 33953623)
      Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1676-1678. (PMID: 32380042)
      Lancet. 2019 Jun 29;393(10191):2647-2650. (PMID: 31153643)
      Int J Circumpolar Health. 2020 Dec;79(1):1715698. (PMID: 32046614)
      BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):1310. (PMID: 31623594)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3274-9. (PMID: 24344285)
      Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 17;18(1):81. (PMID: 32680527)
      Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;8:616763. (PMID: 33575243)
      PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0258252. (PMID: 34679104)
      Microorganisms. 2020 Sep 12;8(9):. (PMID: 32932606)
      Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2):. (PMID: 34297841)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 09;19(9):. (PMID: 35565141)
      J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34. (PMID: 16053581)
      Ann Glob Health. 2022 Nov 16;88(1):102. (PMID: 36447785)
      Minerva. 2022;60(4):489-508. (PMID: 35574292)
      Decis Support Syst. 2022 Nov;162:113752. (PMID: 35185227)
      Rev Sci Tech. 2011 Dec;30(3):779-88. (PMID: 22435190)
      Ecohealth. 2016 Mar;13(1):200-12. (PMID: 26915507)
      Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2133723. (PMID: 36537837)
      Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;11:1208684. (PMID: 37663852)
      Health Soc Care Community. 2011 May;19(3):250-60. (PMID: 21138495)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 13;14(12):. (PMID: 29236028)
      BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:22. (PMID: 23360691)
      Biosecur Bioterror. 2007 Mar;5(1):8-25. (PMID: 17437348)
    • Grant Information:
      NIHR 133333 National Institute for Health and Care Research
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Investigator: LS Babawo; N Berhanu; S Koenraadt; D Makonene; SH Mayhew; V Mohan; E Mokuwa; J Namakula; E Ngunjiri; F Ssengooba; H Sseviiri; R Twinomuhangi; A Vandi
      Keywords: Collaboration; Community Engagement; Community participation; Crisis response; Emergency; Outbreak; Partnership; Realist review; Resilience; Scoping review
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240506 Date Completed: 20240507 Latest Revision: 20240521
    • Publication Date:
      20240521
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11075189
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12961-024-01139-1
    • Accession Number:
      38711067