Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Effect of universal health insurance implementation on beneficiaries' evaluation of public health facilities in Egypt - a cross-sectional study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101147692 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1475-9276 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14759276 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Equity Health Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2002-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study proposal was approved by the IRB of Harvard Faculty of Medicine (IRB21-0337) on 5/10/2021. Further approvals were granted by the Egyptian’s MoHP, and Egypt Healthcare Authority before data collection. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave their informed consent before proceeding with the study procedures. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
      Background: Universal health coverage (UHC) is a key health policy priority to guarantee access to high-quality healthcare without causing undue financial hardship. After many attempts for health reform, Egypt has adopted the Universal Health Insurance (UHI) system in 2018. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of UHI implementation on beneficiaries' perspectives of public healthcare facilities during the early stages of implementation.
      Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 in Egypt, with 785 participants interviewed at UHI and non-UHI areas. All participants were interviewed using a questionnaire for sociodemographic characteristics, perceived health status, insurance plan, and Patient Evaluation Scale -Short form (PES-SF). Besides, participants were asked to report their general evaluation of overall quality, accessibility, and satisfaction with the healthcare services.
      Results: Out of 785 participants, 326 participants were UHI beneficiaries, while 459 were non-UHI enrollees. UHI was associated with a 4.71-point increase in the mean total PES-SF score compared to non-UHC (95% CI: 3.12-6.30, p < 0.001). UHI was associated with an 80% and 56% increase in the likelihood of reporting a good or more overall accessibility and general satisfaction with health facilities, compared to non-UHI, respectively (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.17-2.77, p = 0.008; OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.00-2.43, p = 0.048, respectively). However, perceived overall quality was not significantly associated with UHI status (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.74-1.71, p = 0.578).
      Conclusions: The study finding shows that UHI beneficiaries perceived a higher level of overall satisfaction and accessibility than non-UHI beneficiaries. However, no significant difference exists regarding the perceived overall quality of care. These findings provide valuable insights into the effect of UHI in Egypt and can inform evidence-based policymaking to strengthen the healthcare system and advance universal health coverage objectives.
      (© 2025. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74. (PMID: 20874835)
      J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2022 Jan 7;97(1):1. (PMID: 34994859)
      East Mediterr Health J. 2019 Jul 24;25(5):350-361. (PMID: 31364760)
      Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(6-7):404-12. (PMID: 16335608)
      Int J Equity Health. 2016 May 12;15:76. (PMID: 27176221)
      Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Mar;18(2):161-182. (PMID: 27692025)
      Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Mar 23;21(1):21. (PMID: 36959608)
      Asia Pac Fam Med. 2017 Mar 21;16:4. (PMID: 28344507)
      Int J Equity Health. 2011 Jan 19;10:4. (PMID: 21247436)
      SAGE Open Med. 2021 Sep 03;9:20503121211042512. (PMID: 34504705)
      Hosp Top. 2023 Apr-Jun;101(2):73-83. (PMID: 34445940)
      Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):892-4. (PMID: 24347720)
      BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jun 27;3(3):e000904. (PMID: 29989036)
      Int J Health Plann Manage. 2012 Jan-Mar;27(1):e83-91. (PMID: 21638310)
      Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):792-800. (PMID: 33177776)
      Health Policy Plan. 2008 Mar;23(2):150-60. (PMID: 18245803)
      BMC Med. 2015 Apr 29;13:101. (PMID: 25925656)
      Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. (PMID: 19897823)
      Int J Equity Health. 2013 May 16;12:31. (PMID: 23680066)
      Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e964-e975. (PMID: 30468521)
      Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):75-102. (PMID: 30579611)
      Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Apr 01;6(4):9-21. (PMID: 24999137)
      Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e39-e49. (PMID: 31837954)
      Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):862-4. (PMID: 22959372)
      Inquiry. 1988 Spring;25(1):25-36. (PMID: 2966123)
      Health Syst Reform. 2024 Dec 18;10(3):2368051. (PMID: 39652472)
      Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Mar;37(2):619-631. (PMID: 34725863)
    • Grant Information:
      001 International WHO_ World Health Organization
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Accessibility; Egypt; Health insurance; Patient satisfaction; Perceived quality; Universal health coverage
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20250228 Date Completed: 20250510 Latest Revision: 20250605
    • Publication Date:
      20250605
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11871787
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12939-025-02402-9
    • Accession Number:
      40022187