Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
Decline of German and rise of North-American hegemony in science: Insights from Nobel Prize nominations (Physics/Chemistry, 1901-1969).
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
- Author(s): von der Heyden M;von der Heyden M; Heinze T; Heinze T
- Source:
PloS one [PLoS One] 2025 May 08; Vol. 20 (5), pp. e0323103. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 May 08 (Print Publication: 2025).
- Publication Type:
Journal Article; Historical Article
- Language:
English
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
This paper examines the shift in global scientific leadership from Germany to the United States using data on Nobel Prize nominations in Physics and Chemistry from 1901 to 1969. Building on the theoretical frameworks of Ben-David and Hollingsworth, we explore how nomination patterns reflect global shifts in scientific hegemony. In the early 20th century, Germany dominated the Nobel nomination process, with its scientists frequently acting both as nominators and nominees. During the 1930s, however, the United States rose to prominence, becoming the leading force in global science. By the mid-20th century, American scientists constituted a substantial share of both nominees and nominators, reflecting the nation's emergence as a global research leader. Self-nomination trends align with this hegemonic transition. Despite their dominance in the nomination process during their respective periods of global leadership, neither country demonstrated a particular capacity to influence selection outcomes. Regression analysis reveals limited advantages for nominees from hegemonic nations and no consistent effects for nominators, illustrating the distinction between controlling nominations and shaping laureate selections. This study offers insights into the dynamics of scientific prestige and the relationship between national hegemony and institutional frameworks.
(Copyright: © 2025 von der Heyden, Heinze. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Abstract:
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
- References:
Br Dent J. 2022 Jun;232(11):825-829. (PMID: 35689067)
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 21;9(1):17304. (PMID: 31754196)
Chemistry. 2023 Jun 27;29(36):e202203985. (PMID: 37204108)
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 3;14(4):e0213916. (PMID: 30943240)
Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63. (PMID: 5634379)
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239805. (PMID: 32997679)
Hist Stud Phys Biol Sci. 1989;20(pt 1):63-77. (PMID: 11622206)
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 1;17(4):e0265929. (PMID: 35363795)
Int J Surg. 2014;12(9):998-1002. (PMID: 25094023)
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;277(4):1255-1258. (PMID: 32036407)
Scientometrics. 2016;109(2):723-767. (PMID: 27795592)
Sci Adv. 2015 Feb 12;1(1):e1400005. (PMID: 26601125)
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7930):120-127. (PMID: 36131023)
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20250508 Date Completed: 20250508 Latest Revision: 20250511
- Publication Date:
20260130
- Accession Number:
PMC12061115
- Accession Number:
10.1371/journal.pone.0323103
- Accession Number:
40338924
No Comments.