Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Skin burns after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a retrospective control study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
      High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a minimally invasive treatment for benign gynecological diseases, though skin burns remain a potential complication. Understanding risk factors is critical for improving safety. In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors for skin burns in patients who underwent HIFU ablation. This retrospective study included 229 patients who underwent HIFU ablation for benign gynecological diseases. The medical records of the included patients were retrospectively analyzed to identify risk factors for skin burns. The main outcome measure was the identification of the risk factors contributing to skin burns following HIFU ablation. Among the 229 included patients, 6 experienced skin burns following HIFU ablation. Multivariate regression analysis identified several factors associated with the occurrence of skin burns, including treatment duration, sonication time, focusing depth, and water sac use (P < 0.05). The duration of treatment and degree of skin compression are key factors that contribute to skin burns (P < 0.05). Shortening treatment duration, incorporating intraoperative cooling intervals, and limiting both compression duration and intensity significantly reduce skin burn incidence and improve patient outcomes.
      (© 2025. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Stewart, E. A., Cookson, C. L., Gandolfo, R. A. & Schulze-Rath, R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG 124, 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14640 (2017). (PMID: 10.1111/1471-0528.1464028296146)
      Stewart, E. A. et al. Uterine fibroids. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2, 16043. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.43 (2016). (PMID: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.4327335259)
      Taran, F. A., Stewart, E. A., Brucker, S. & Adenomyosis Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 73, 92431. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350840 (2013). (PMID: 10.1055/s-0033-1350840)
      Shrestha, A., Shrestha, R., Sedhai, L. B. & Pandit, U. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: prevalence, patient characteristics, clinical profile and histopathological findings. Kathmandu Univ. Med. J. (KUMJ). 10, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i1.6915 (2012). (PMID: 10.3126/kumj.v10i1.691522971863)
      Tsai, M. C., Chang, L. T. & Tam, K. W. Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and conventional surgery for patients with uterine myomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 28, 1712–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.002 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.00234126271)
      Cheung, V. Y. T. High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 46, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.002 (2018). (PMID: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.00229074037)
      Ji, Y. et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 296, 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4548-9 (2017). (PMID: 10.1007/s00404-017-4548-928975434)
      Zhou, C. Y., Xu, X. J. & He, J. Pregnancy outcomes and symptom improvement of patients with adenomyosis treated with high intensity focused ultrasound ablation (in Chinese). Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 51, 845–849. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.11.009 (2016). (PMID: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.11.00927916069)
      Chen, J. et al. Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a review of 9988 cases. Ultrason. Sonochem. 27, 671–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.05.031 (2015). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.05.03126093678)
      Lee, J. Y. et al. Portable ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound with functions for safe and rapid ablation: prospective clinical trial for uterine fibroids-short-term and long-term results. Eur. Radiol. 30, 1554–1563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06468-2 (2020). (PMID: 10.1007/s00330-019-06468-231705252)
      Yin, N. et al. Factors influencing thermal injury to skin and abdominal wall structures in HIFU ablation of uterine fibroids. Int. J. Hyperth. 34, 1298–1303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2018.1433880 (2018). (PMID: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1433880)
      Yan, L., Huang, H., Lin, J. & Yu, R. High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Hyperth. 39, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2022.2029956 (2022). (PMID: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2029956)
      Marques, A. L. S., Andres, M. P., Kho, R. M. & Abrão, M. S. Is high-intensity focused ultrasound effective for the treatment of adenomyosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 27, 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.029 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.02931377454)
      Izadifar, Z., Izadifar, Z., Chapman, D. & Babyn, P. An introduction to high intensity focused ultrasound: systematic review on principles, devices, and clinical applications. J. Clin. Med. 9, 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020460 (2020). (PMID: 10.3390/jcm9020460320460727073974)
      Xiong, Y. et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for the treatment of patients with adenomyosis and prior abdominal surgical scars: a retrospective study. Int. J. Hyperth. 31, 777–783. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2015.1071436 (2015). (PMID: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1071436)
      Leon-Villapalos, J., Kaniorou-Larai, M. & Dziewulski, P. Full thickness abdominal burn following magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound therapy. Burns 31, 1054–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.019 (2005). (PMID: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.01915970389)
      Liu, X. et al. Clinical predictors of long-term success in ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study. Med. (Baltim). 95, e2443. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002443 (2016). (PMID: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002443)
      Zanganeh, M. et al. Skin grafting compared with Conservative treatment in patients with deep second-degree burn wounds of the trunk and buttocks. World J. Plast. Surg. 11, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.52547/wjps.11.1.81 (2022). (PMID: 10.52547/wjps.11.1.81355922219018036)
      Elfawy, L. A. et al. Sustainable approach of functional biomaterials-tissue engineering for skin burn treatment: a comprehensive review. Pharmaceuticals 16, 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16050701 (2023). (PMID: 10.3390/ph160507013724248310223453)
      Tammam, B. M. H., Habotta, O. A., El-Khadragy, M., Abdel Moneim, A. E. & Abdalla, M. S. Therapeutic role of mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma on skin burn healing and rejuvenation: a focus on Scar regulation, oxido-inflammatory stress and apoptotic mechanisms. Heliyon 9, e19452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19452 (2023). (PMID: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e194523766279710472052)
      Verpalen, I. M. et al. The focused ultrasound Myoma outcome study (FUMOS); a retrospective cohort study on long-term outcomes of MR-HIFU therapy. Eur. Radiol. 30, 2473–2482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06641-7 (2020). (PMID: 10.1007/s00330-019-06641-732040725)
      Quinn, S. D., Vedelago, J., Gedroyc, W. & Regan, L. Safety and five-year re-intervention following magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for uterine fibroids. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 182, 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.039 (2014). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.03925445107)
      Kociuba, J. et al. Adverse events and complications after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) therapy in uterine fibroids - a systematic review and future perspectives. Int. J. Hyperth. 40, 2174274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2023.2174274 (2023). (PMID: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2174274)
      Khalilzadeh, O. et al. Proposal of a new adverse event classification by the society of interventional radiology standards of practice committee. J. Vasc Interv Radiol. 28, 1432–37e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019 (2017). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.01928757285)
      Zhang, X. et al. Effective ablation therapy of adenomyosis with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 124, 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.08.022 (2014). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.08.02224380611)
      Kociuba, J. et al. Occurrence of adverse events after magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) therapy in symptomatic uterine fibroids-a retrospective case-control study. Int. J. Hyperth. 40, 2219436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2023.2219436 (2023). (PMID: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2219436)
      Mehtali, J., Verde, J. & Essert, C. Heat: high-efficiency simulation for thermal ablation therapy. Int. J. CARS. 20, 1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03350-z (2025). (PMID: 10.1007/s11548-025-03350-z)
      Tasnim, Z. J. & Nasrin, R. Thermal wave and pennes’ models of bioheat transfer in human skin: A transient comparative analysis. Heliyon 10 (21), e40109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40109 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e401093955919411570517)
      Sagi, A. et al. Combined thermal and crush injury to the hand and fingers. Burns 23, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-4179(96)00116-7 (1997). (PMID: 10.1016/s0305-4179(96)00116-79177890)
      Liu, W. et al. Intrarectal Foley catheter-assisted high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for benign uterine diseases beyond the treatment region. Int. J. Hyperth. 40, 2219435. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2023.2219435 (2023). (PMID: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2219435)
      Dao-de, S. Selection of the linear regression model according to the parameter Estimation. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 5, 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850764 (2000). (PMID: 10.1007/BF02850764)
      Schneider, A., Hommel, G. & Blettner, M. Linear regression analysis: part 14 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch. Arztebl Int. 107, 776–782. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0776 (2010). (PMID: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0776211163972992018)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Adenomyosis; Complication; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Skin burn; Uterine fibroids
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20250801 Date Completed: 20250801 Latest Revision: 20250806
    • Publication Date:
      20250806
    • Accession Number:
      PMC12317018
    • Accession Number:
      10.1038/s41598-025-13436-y
    • Accession Number:
      40750815