Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Performance of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Cryobiopsy in Diagnosing Thoracic Disorders and Its Role in Next-Generation Sequencing for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101558762 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2090-1844 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20901844 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Pulm Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2024- : [Hoboken, NJ] : Wiley
      Original Publication: Cairo : Hindawi Pub. Corp.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Competing Interests: Dr. Sze Shyang Kho has received a travel grant from ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH. Dr. Chun Ian Soo has received speaker honoraria from Cook Medical. All other authors have no conflict of interest.
      Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established procedure for diagnosing thoracic diseases and staging of lung cancers. However, some limitations of cytology specimens from EBUS-TBNA include small sample size, low tumour cellularity, necrosis and specimen contamination. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) is a promising alternative that provides a larger histology specimen which may improve diagnostic accuracy and molecular testing. This study is aimed at evaluating the benefits of EBUS-TBMC over EBUS-TBNA, focusing on improving next-generation sequencing (NGS) success rates, and assessing its efficacy and safety in a real-world setting. Methods: Data from 203 patients (99 underwent EBUS-TBNA and 104 underwent EBUS-TBMC) were retrospectively traced and analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: The overall diagnostic yield was significantly higher for EBUS-TBMC (90.38%) than that for EBUS-TBNA (67.68%; p < 0.001). For heterogeneous lesions, the diagnostic yield was 92.31% for EBUS-TBMC and 69.44% for EBUS-TBNA ( p = 0.011). For non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EBUS-TBMC specimens demonstrated higher overall tumour cellularity (65% vs. 30%; p < 0.001) and better success in detecting driver alterations through NGS (85.36% vs. 61.90%; p = 0.035). The median procedure duration was shorter for EBUS-TBMC (22 vs. 32 min; p < 0.001), and the complication rates were comparable between the two techniques. These findings suggest that EBUS-TBMC offers additional diagnostic advantages over EBUS-TBNA for heterogeneous lesions and significantly facilitates the acquisition of cell-rich specimens for NGS testing. Conclusion: EBUS-TBMC increases the overall diagnostic yield of mediastinal diseases. EBUS-TBMC provides cell-rich histology specimens with high tumour content, facilitating NGS testing in the management of NSCLC.
      (Copyright © 2025 Chun Ian Soo et al. Pulmonary Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
    • References:
      J Thorac Dis. 2017 May;9(Suppl 5):S395-S404. (PMID: 28603651)
      ERJ Open Res. 2023 Apr 17;9(2):. (PMID: 37077551)
      Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Mar;11(3):256-264. (PMID: 36279880)
      J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Aug;15(8):1087-1096. (PMID: 29941240)
      Thorac Cancer. 2013 May;4(2):186-190. (PMID: 28920208)
      Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;96(4):1196-1202. (PMID: 23972930)
      Eur Respir J. 2009 May;33(5):1156-64. (PMID: 19407050)
      Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 23;13(23):. (PMID: 34884991)
      Chest. 2016 Mar;149(3):816-35. (PMID: 26402427)
      Eur Respir J. 2021 Dec 9;58(6):. (PMID: 33958432)
      J Thorac Dis. 2022 Apr;14(4):892-904. (PMID: 35572900)
      Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Feb;142(2):253-262. (PMID: 28639854)
      Cancer Imaging. 2009 Dec 24;9:104-11. (PMID: 20080453)
      Pulmonology. 2024 Sep-Oct;30(5):459-465. (PMID: 38182468)
      Chest. 2015 Dec;148(6):1430-1437. (PMID: 26158441)
      Thorax. 2013 Aug;68 Suppl 1:i1-i44. (PMID: 23860341)
      Chest. 2010 Sep;138(3):641-7. (PMID: 20382710)
      Mediastinum. 2020 Sep 30;4:19. (PMID: 35118287)
      AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Sep;207(3):534-43. (PMID: 27305342)
      Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Dec;10(6):636-43. (PMID: 24079724)
      Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:17-26. (PMID: 35151114)
      Respiration. 2024;103(7):359-367. (PMID: 38588649)
      Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 19;13(22):. (PMID: 37998611)
      J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2024 Jan 01;31(1):2-12. (PMID: 36877194)
      Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e211S-e250S. (PMID: 23649440)
      Lung. 2024 Jun;202(3):317-324. (PMID: 38687384)
      Med J Malaysia. 2024 Jul;79(4):490-493. (PMID: 39086350)
      BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Aug 13;22(1):311. (PMID: 35964027)
      Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):393-400. (PMID: 32067944)
      Eur Respir Rev. 2013 Jun 1;22(128):106-16. (PMID: 23728864)
      J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4217-4228. (PMID: 39144333)
      J Cytol. 2020 Apr-Jun;37(2):72-81. (PMID: 32606494)
      Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18653. (PMID: 39134712)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20250908 Date Completed: 20250908 Latest Revision: 20250910
    • Publication Date:
      20250910
    • Accession Number:
      PMC12411052
    • Accession Number:
      10.1155/pm/3522554
    • Accession Number:
      40918753