Early treatment with a combination of two potent neutralizing antibodies improves clinical outcomes and reduces virus replication and lung inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 infected macaques

There is an urgent need for effective therapeutic interventions against SARS-CoV-2, including new variants that continue to arise. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies have shown promise in clinical studies. We investigated the therapeutic efficacy of a combination of two potent monoclonal antibodies, C135-LS and C144-LS that carry half-life extension mutations, in the rhesus macaque model of COVID-19. Twelve young adult macaques (three groups of four animals) were inoculated intranasally and intra-tracheally with a high dose of SARS-CoV-2 and 24 hours later, treated intravenously with a high (40 mg/kg) or low (12 mg/kg) dose of the C135-LS and C144-LS antibody combination, or a control monoclonal antibody. Animals were monitored for 7 days. Compared to the control animals, animals treated with either dose of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies showed similarly improved clinical scores, lower levels of virus replication in upper and lower respiratory tract, and significantly reduced interstitial pneumonia, as measured by comprehensive lung histology. In conclusion, this study provides proof-of-concept in support of further clinical development of these monoclonal antibodies against COVID-19 during early infection.
Author summary Monoclonal antibodies that neutralize SARS-CoV-2 have shown promise in treating recently infected individuals who are at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19 disease. Although several monoclonal antibodies are currently being used in the clinic, there is an ongoing need to develop additional antibodies. The ideal monoclonal antibodies, or combinations, should be potent and durable, and maintain activity against emerging viral variants. In this study, we tested a combination of two potent monoclonal antibodies, C135-LS and C-144-LS, engineered to have long half-lives, in the macaque model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Animals treated early after infection fared better than placebo-treated controls, manifesting fewer clinical signs, less virus replication in the respiratory tract, and reduced lung inflammation. These promising data support clinical testing of these monoclonal antibodies in humans and further development of similar antibody-based prophylactic and therapeutic strategies.