Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Testing the Expert Based Weights Used in the UK’s Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Against Three Preference-Based Methods

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      University of Aberdeen.Health Economics Research Unit; University of Aberdeen.Institute of Applied Health Sciences
    • Publication Information:
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.
    • Publication Date:
      2019
    • Abstract:
      The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), used widely in England, is an important tool for social need and inequality identification. It summarises deprivation across seven dimensions (income, employment, health, education, housing and services, environment, and crime) to measure an area’s multidimensional deprivation. The IMD aggregates the dimensions that are differentially weighted using expert judgement. In this paper, we test how close these weights are to society’s preferences about the relative importance of each dimension to overall deprivation. There is not agreement in the literature on how to do this. This paper, therefore, develops and compares three empirical methods for estimating preference-based weights. We find the weights are similar across the methods, and between our empirical methods and the current IMD, but our findings suggest a change to two of the weights.
    • File Description:
      PDF; application/pdf
    • ISSN:
      1573-0921
      0303-8300
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s11205-018-02054-z
    • Rights:
      Springer TDM
    • Accession Number:
      edsair.doi.dedup.....ef40c738b635a46730c2f885b86ea857