Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Cost-effectiveness of a structured medication review approach for multimorbid older adults: Within-trial analysis of the OPERAM study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      UCL - SSS/LDRI - Louvain Drug Research Institute; UCL - (MGD) Département de pharmacie
    • Publication Information:
      Public Library of Science
    • Publication Date:
      2022
    • Collection:
      DIAL@UCL (Université catholique de Louvain)
    • Abstract:
      BACKGROUND: Inappropriate polypharmacy has been linked with adverse outcomes in older, multimorbid adults. OPERAM is a European cluster-randomized trial aimed at testing the effect of a structured pharmacotherapy optimization intervention on preventable drug-related hospital admissions in multimorbid adults with polypharmacy aged 70 years or older. Clinical results of the trial showed a pattern of reduced drug-related hospital admissions, but without statistical significance. In this study we assessed the cost-effectiveness of the pharmacotherapy optimisation intervention. METHODS: We performed a pre-planned within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the OPERAM intervention, from a healthcare system perspective. All data were collected within the trial apart from unit costs. QALYs were computed by applying the crosswalk German valuation algorithm to EQ-5D-5L-based quality of life data. Considering the clustered structure of the data and between-country heterogeneity, we applied Generalized Structural Equation Models (GSEMs) on a multiple imputed sample to estimate costs and QALYs. We also performed analyses by country and subgroup analyses by patient and morbidity characteristics. RESULTS: Trial-wide, the intervention was numerically dominant, with a potential cost-saving of CHF 3'588 (95% confidence interval (CI): -7'716; 540) and gain of 0.025 QALYs (CI: -0.002; 0.052) per patient. Robustness analyses confirmed the validity of the GSEM model. Subgroup analyses suggested stronger effects in people at higher risk. CONCLUSION: We observed a pattern towards dominance, potentially resulting from an accumulation of multiple small positive intervention effects. Our methodological approaches may inform other CEAs of multi-country, cluster-randomized trials facing presence of missing values and heterogeneity between centres/countries.
    • ISSN:
      1932-6203
    • Relation:
      boreal:260231; http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/260231; info:pmid/35404990; urn:EISSN:1932-6203
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0265507
    • Online Access:
      http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/260231
      https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265507
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.1B9EA698