Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN BRAZIL AND SPAIN: THE CASE OF VAQUEJADA AND BULLFIGHTING ; LA PROTECCIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL EN BRASIL Y ESPAÑA: EL CASO DE LA VAQUEJADA Y LAS CORRIDAS DE TOROS ; A PROTEÇÃO DO PATRIMÔNIO CULTURAL NO BRASIL E NA ESPANHA: O CASO DA VAQUEJADA E DAS TOURADAS

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Costa, Beatriz Souza; Nacur Rezende, Elcio
  • Source:
    Veredas do Direito; Vol. 21 (2024): Veredas do Direito, v. 21, 2024; e212641 ; Veredas do Direito – Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; v. 21 (2024): Veredas do Direito, v. 21, 2024; e212641 ; 2179-8699
  • Document Type:
    article in journal/newspaper
  • Language:
    Portuguese
    English
    Spanish; Castilian
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Editora Dom Helder
    • Publication Date:
      2024
    • Collection:
      Veredas do Direito: Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável
    • Abstract:
      Cultural heritage in Brazil and Spain has constitutional protection. It is stated that the environment, in its different meanings, is treated as a fundamental right in both countries and, therefore, arguments of lesser legal strength, including infra-constitutional norms, for possible disrespect toward environmental goods, including animal life, are ruled out. Thus, the aim of this article is to demonstrate that animal life has greater legal value than norms established under the argument of cultural heritage. The article was based on the hypothetical deductive methodology with a comparative legislative research technique, as well as bibliographical research and references in national and international journals. The results show that in Brazil and Spain animal life should have greater legal protection than arguments based on cultural heritage, concluding that, in honor of the theory of fundamental rights and modern constitutionalism, rules that allow animal suffering are unconstitutional and should therefore be removed from the legal system in Brazil and Spain. ; El patrimonio cultural en Brasil y España encuentran tutela constitucional. Se afirma que el medio ambiente, en sus diferentes acepciones, es tratado como un derecho fundamental en ambos países y, por lo tanto, se rechazan argumentos de menor robustez jurídica, incluidas normas infraconstitucionales, para cualquier falta de respeto a los bienes ambientales, incluida la vida animal. El objetivo de este artículo es demostrar, por lo tanto, que la vida animal tiene una valoración jurídica mayor que las normas positivadas bajo el argumento de patrimonio cultural. El artículo se basó en la metodología hipotético-deductiva con técnica de investigación legislativa comparada, así como bibliográfica y referencias en revistas nacionales e internacionales. Los resultados indican que, en Brasil y España, la vida animal debe tener una mayor protección jurídica que los argumentos basados en el patrimonio cultural, concluyendo que, en honor a la teoría de los derechos ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://revista.domhelder.edu.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/2641/25676; https://revista.domhelder.edu.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/2641/25677; https://revista.domhelder.edu.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/2641/25678; https://revista.domhelder.edu.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/2641
    • Online Access:
      https://revista.domhelder.edu.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/2641
    • Rights:
      Copyright (c) 2024 Veredas do Direito – Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.25799736