Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Must art have a place?: Questioning the power of the digital artscape

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Queensland University of Technology
    • Publication Date:
      2016
    • Collection:
      Northumbria University, Newcastle: Northumbria Research Link (NRL)
    • Abstract:
      There is an ongoing debate on ‘place’ and where it begins and ends; on the ways that cities exist in both material and immaterial forms, and thereby, how to locate and understand place as an anchoring point amidst global flows (Massey; Merrifield). This debate extends to the global art- scape, as traditional conceptions of art and art-making attached to place require re-thinking in a paradigm where digital and immaterial networks, symbols and forums both complement and complicate the role that place has traditionally played (Luger, “Singaporean ‘Spaces of Hope?”). The digital art-scape has allowed for art-led provocations, transformations and disturbances to traditional institutions and gatekeepers (see Hartley’s “ Communication, Media, and Cultural Studies” concept of ‘gatekeeper’) of the art world, which often served as elite checkpoints and way-stations to artistic prominence. Still, contradictory and paradoxical questions emerge, since art cannot be divorced of place entirely, and ‘place’ often features as a topic, subject, or site of critical expression for art regardless of material or immaterial form. Critical art is at once place-bound and place-less; anchored to sites even as it transcends them completely.This paper will explore the dualistic tension – and somewhat contradictory relationship – between physical and digital artistic space through the case study of authoritarian Singapore, by focusing on a few examples of art-activists and the way that they have used and manipulated both physical and digital spaces for art-making. These examples draw upon research which took place in Singapore from 2012-2014 and which involved interviews with, and observation of, a selected sample (30) of art-activists (or “artivists”, to use Krischer’s definition). Findings point to a highly co-dependent relationship between physical and digital art places where both offer unique spaces of possibility and limitations. Therefore, place remains essential in art-making, even as digital avenues expand and amplify what ...
    • File Description:
      text
    • Relation:
      https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/44129/1/Must%20Art%20Have%20a%20%E2%80%98Place%E2%80%99%20Questioning%20the%20Power%20of%20the%20Digital%20Art-Scape%20%20Luger.pdf; Luger, Jason (2016) Must art have a place?: Questioning the power of the digital artscape. Journal of Media and Culture, 19 (3). ISSN 1441-2616
    • Online Access:
      https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/44129/
      http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1094
      https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/44129/1/Must%20Art%20Have%20a%20%E2%80%98Place%E2%80%99%20Questioning%20the%20Power%20of%20the%20Digital%20Art-Scape%20%20Luger.pdf
    • Rights:
      cc_by_nc_nd_4_0
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.33C838C