Abstract: The paper discusses disputable issues related to the obligation of the physician to inform the patient in order to obtain his valid consent to undertake a medically indicated procedure. The subject of comparative analysis is this institute in domestic regulation (primarily in the Law on Patients' Rights) and in certain European and Anglo-Saxon solutions, in order to formulate proposals for more adequate determination for domestic regulation de lege ferenda. The author critically analyzes: the doctrine of "informed consent"; the scope of the physician's obligation to inform the patient; the issue of limiting the rules on mandatory patient information, and in particular, the so-called "Therapeutic privilege". The author draws a conclusion about the new legal solution as more comprehensive than the previous one and more harmonized with European standards, which finally recognizes the predominance of the patient's right to self-determination over the principle of preserving the patient's wellbeing. The paper also critically discusses the types and conditions for establishing the civil liability of a physician for damage caused to a patient by denying notification, by violating his personal right to self-determination.
No Comments.