Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Characteristics of Patients Treated with JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis before versus after VTE Risk Warnings

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      Institut Catholique de Lille (ICL); Université catholique de Lille (UCL); Marrow Adiposity & Bone Lab - Adiposité Médullaire et Os - ULR 4490 (MABLab (ex-pmoi)); Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale (ULCO)-Université de Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire CHU Lille (CHRU Lille); Service de rhumatologie Lille; Hôpital Roger Salengro Lille -Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire CHU Lille (CHRU Lille); CHU Amiens-Picardie; HEMATIM - Hématopoïèse et immunologie - UR UPJV 4666 (HEMATIM); Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)-CHU Amiens-Picardie-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire CHU Lille (CHRU Lille); Université de Lille
    • Publication Information:
      HAL CCSD
      MDPI
    • Publication Date:
      2023
    • Collection:
      LillOA (HAL Lille Open Archive, Université de Lille)
    • Abstract:
      International audience ; Background: Baricitinib (BARI) or Tofacitinib (TOFA) were the first Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) to be marketed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Concerns regarding venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk have emerged during the past years. The aim of the study was to compare the baseline characteristics of patients initiating BARI or TOFA in RA before versus after European Medicine Agency (EMA)’s VTE warnings and to compare real-world persistence with these two drugs. Methods: In this multicentric cohort study, RA patients initiating BARI or TOFA were included from October 2017, date of BARI marketing authorization in France, to September 2020. Baseline characteristics regarding VTE risk were compared (before vs. after May 2019) by using pre-specified statistical tests. Comparison of persistence was assessed by using propensity-score methods. Results: 232 patients were included; 155 with BARI and 77 with TOFA. Baseline characteristics of patients regarding VTE risk factors were not statistically different when Janus Kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was initiated before vs. after EMA’s warnings although a trend towards a lower proportion of VTE history was observed. Five VTE events occurred, four with BARI, one with TOFA. Cumulative persistence rate at 2 years was similar between BARI and TOFA: HR 0.96; 95% Cl: 0.52 to 1.74; p = 0.89. Conclusions: Our study did not show a significant change in patients characteristics starting a JAKi after the EMA’s warnings, probably due to a lack of power. Though, the lower proportion of VTE history in patients after May 2019 suggests that rheumatologists have taken into account the potential VTE risk. These results need to be confirmed by further evidence.
    • Relation:
      hal-03959526; https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-03959526
    • Accession Number:
      10.3390/jcm12010207
    • Online Access:
      https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010207
      https://u-picardie.hal.science/hal-03959526
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.4AAF8170