Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparison of genome replication fidelity between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus in cell culture

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Springer Nature
    • Publication Date:
      2023
    • Collection:
      NAOSITE: Nagasaki University Academic Output SITE / 長崎大学 学術研究成果リポジトリ
    • Abstract:
      Since the emergence of COVID-19, several SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) variants have emerged and spread widely. These variants are produced through replication errors of the viral genome by viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Seasonal epidemics of influenza are also known to occur because of new variants of influenza A virus (IAV), which are generated by the introduction of mutations by viral RdRp with low fidelity. Variants with different antigenicities appear because of mutations in envelope glycoproteins. In this study, we calculated and compared the mutation rates in genome replication of IAV and SARS-CoV-2. Average mutation rates per passage were 9.01 × 10–5 and 3.76 × 10–6 substitutions/site for IAV and SARS-CoV-2, respectively. The mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 was 23.9-fold lower than that of IAV because of the proofreading activity of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp complex. Our data could be useful in establishing effective countermeasures against COVID-19. ; Scientific Reports, 13(1), art. no. 13105; 2023 ; journal article
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • ISSN:
      2045-2322
    • Relation:
      Scientific Reports; 13; art. no. 13105; https://nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000154/files/SR13_13105.pdf
    • Online Access:
      https://nagasaki-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000154/files/SR13_13105.pdf
    • Rights:
      This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2023
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.5E2D41CA