Publication Information: Linköpings universitet, Tema Miljöförändring
Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten
University of Paris Saclay, France
NASA, MD 20771 USA
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Australia
NOAA ESRL, CO 80305 USA
Ist Nazl Geofis and Vulcanol, Italy
SRON, Netherlands; Institute Marine and Atmospher Research, Netherlands
European Commiss Joint Research Centre, Italy
Food and Agriculture Org United Nations FAO, Italy
Seconda University of Napoli, Italy; FEFU, Russia; Euromediterranean Centre Climate Change, Italy
Stanford University, CA 94305 USA
Environm and Climate Change Canada, Canada
University of Sheffield, England
University of Calif Irvine, CA 92697 USA
National Institute Water and Atmospher Research, New Zealand
Max Planck Institute Meteorol, Germany
Ecole Polytech, France
Bolin Centre Climate Research, Sweden
Yale University, CT 06511 USA
University of Victoria, Canada
Jet Prop Lab, CA 91109 USA
Joint Centre Hydrometeorol Research, England
Int Institute Appl Syst Anal, Austria
Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
University of Bern, Switzerland
CSIRO, Australia
NCAR, CO 80307 USA
CUNY, NY 10031 USA
Max Planck Institute Biogeochem, Germany
NOAA, NJ 08540 USA
University of Bristol, England
Lund University, Sweden
JAMSTEC, Japan
University of Quebec, Canada
CICERO, Norway
Observ Paris, France
MIT, MA 02139 USA
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, CA 94720 USA
Euromediterranean Centre Climate Change, Italy
CUNY, NY 10031 USA; University of Hohenheim, Germany
University of Bern, Switzerland; University of Bern, Switzerland
JMA, Japan
Auburn University, AL 36849 USA
Imperial Coll London, England
KNMI, Netherlands
Vrije University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
University of Calif San Diego, CA 92093 USA
Met Off Hadley Centre, England
Environm Canada, Canada
University of Toronto, Canada
NASA, MD 20771 USA; Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Switzerland
Northwest AandF University, Peoples R China
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
Abstract: The global methane (CH4) budget is becoming an increasingly important component for managing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. This relevance, due to a shorter atmospheric lifetime and a stronger warming potential than carbon dioxide, is challenged by the still unexplained changes of atmospheric CH4 over the past decade. Emissions and concentrations of CH4 are continuing to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-induced greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Two major difficulties in reducing uncertainties come from the large variety of diffusive CH4 sources that overlap geographically, and from the destruction of CH4 by the very short-lived hydroxyl radical (OH). To address these difficulties, we have established a consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate research on the methane cycle, and producing regular (similar to biennial) updates of the global methane budget. This consortium includes atmospheric physicists and chemists, biogeochemists of surface and marine emissions, and socio-economists who study anthropogenic emissions. Following Kirschke et al. (2013), we propose here the first version of a living review paper that integrates results of top-down studies (exploiting atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up models, inventories and data-driven approaches (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, and inventories for anthropogenic emissions, data-driven extrapolations). For the 2003-2012 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by top-down inversions at 558 TgCH(4) yr(-1), range 540-568. About 60% of global emissions are anthropogenic (range 50-65 %). Since 2010, the bottom-up global emission inventories have been closer to methane emissions in the most carbon-intensive Representative Concentrations Pathway (RCP8.5) and higher than all other RCP scenarios. Bottom-up approaches suggest larger ...
No Comments.