Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Caracterización de los pacientes llevados a uretroplastia entre 2013 y 2021 en la Clínica Foscal ; Characterization of patients undergoing urethroplasty between 2013 and 2021 at Clínica Foscal

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      Sarmiento Sarmiento, Guillermo; Tobar Roa, Verónica; Camacho López, Paul Anthony; Tobar Roa, Verónica =0001473919; Camacho López, Paul Anthony 0000323578; Camacho López, Paul Anthony es&oi=ao; Sarmiento Sarmiento, Guillermo 0000-0001-5492-7168; Camacho López, Paul Anthony 0000-0002-6233-9582; Tobar Roa, Verónica Veronica-Roa-2; Camacho López, Paul Anthony paul-anthony-camacho-lópez; Camacho López, Paul Anthony paulcamachomdepi
    • Publication Information:
      Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
      Facultad Ciencias de la Salud
      Especialización en Urología
    • Publication Date:
      2022
    • Subject Terms:
      Floridablanca (Santander, Colombia); UNAB Campus Bucaramanga
    • Subject Terms:
      2013-2022
    • Abstract:
      La estrechez uretral se define como cualquier estrechamiento a nivel uretral que genere o no alteración en el flujo de la orina. Tiene una incidencia desconocida, estimada en 0.2 a 0.6%. En Colombia no existen datos acerca de su incidencia, ni de los costos que trae consigo. Dentro de las opciones de manejo, la reconstrucción uretral por medio de uretroplastia se ha catalogado como el gold standard. Se puede realizar como escisión y anastomosis primaria o con injertos de mucosa, ambos con porcentajes de éxito de hasta 85%. Por medio de este trabajo buscamos demostrar los resultados funcionales en el patrón miccional de los pacientes con diagnóstico de estrechez uretral sometidos a reconstrucción uretral. ; 1. Lista de tablas 2. Lista de figuras 3. Lista de anexos 4. Glosario 5. Resumen 5.1. Español 5.2. Inglés 6. Introducción 7. Descripción del proyecto 7.1. Planteamiento del problema de investigación y su justificación en términos de necesidades y pertinencia 8. Marco teórico 9. Estado del arte 10. Objetivos 10.1.1. General 10.1.2. Específicos 11. Metodología 11.1.1. Diseño 11.1.2. Universo 11.1.3. Población y muestra 11.1.4. Criterios de elegibilidad 11.1.4.1. Inclusión 11.1.4.2. Exclusión 11.1.5. Variables 11.1.6. Descripción de los procedimientos del protocolo 11.1.7. Depuración de datos y plan de análisis de datos 12. Disposiciones vigentes 12.1. Impacto ambiental 12.2. Consideraciones éticas 13. Resultados 14. Discusión 15. Conclusiones 16. Referencias bibliográficas 17. Tablas 18. Figuras 19. Anexos ; Especialización ; Urethral stricture is defined as any narrowing at the urethral level that generates or No disturbance in the flow of urine. It has an unknown incidence, estimated at 0.2 to 0.6% In Colombia there are no data about its incidence, nor about the costs it brings with him. Among the management options, urethral reconstruction by means of urethroplasty has been classified as the gold standard. Can be performed as excision and primary anastomosis or with mucosa grafts, both with success rates of ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term results of urethroplasty. Journal of Urology. 2003 Jul 1;170(1):90–2.; Barbagli G, Kulkarni SB, Fossati N, Larcher A, Sansalone S, Guazzoni G, et al. Long-term followup and deterioration rate of anterior substitution urethroplasty. Journal of Urology. 2014;192(3):808–13.; Bradley A. Erickson, George M. Ghareeb. Definition of Successful Treatment and Optimal Follow-up after Urethral Reconstruction for Urethral Stricture Disease. Urol Clin N Am. 2017;1–9.; Lazzeri M, Sansalone S, Guazzoni G, Barbagli G. Incidence, Causes, and Complications of Urethral Stricture Disease. European Urology, Supplements. 2016;15(1):2–6.; Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P. Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: Long-term followup. Journal of Urology. 1996;156(1):73–5.; Tonkin JB, Jordan GH. Management of distal anterior urethral strictures. Nat Rev Urol. 2009;6(10):533–8.; Osterberg EC, Murphy G, Harris CR, Breyer BN. Cost-effective Strategies for the Management and Treatment of Urethral Stricture Disease. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2017;44(1):11–7.; Contreras-García R, García-Perdomo HA, Robayo-Ramirez J. Experiencia en el manejo de la estrechez uretral en un centro de tercer nivel en Colombia. Urologia Colombiana. 2017;26(2):98–103; McCammon KA, Zuckerman JM, Jordan GH. Surgery of the Penis and Urethra. In: Campbell-Walsh urology. 2016. p. 907–45.; Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Willemsen P, De Troyer B, Pieters R, Oosterlinck W. Etiology of Urethral Stricture Disease in the 21st Century. Journal of Urology. 2009;182(3):983–7.; Stein DM, Thum DJ, Barbagli G, Kulkarni S, Sansalone S, Pardeshi A, et al. A geographic analysis of male urethral stricture aetiology and location. BJU Int. 2013;112(6):830–4.; Zumrutbas AE, Ozlulerden Y, Celen S, Kucuker K, Aybek Z. The outcomes of Kulkarni’s one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty in patients with panurethral stricture: a single centre experience. World J Urol. 2019;(0123456789).; Browne BM, Vanni AJ. Use of Alternative Techniques and Grafts in Urethroplasty. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2017;44(1):127–40.; Anger JT, Buckley JC, Santucci RA, Elliott SP, Saigal CS. Trends in stricture management among male medicare beneficiaries: Underuse of urethroplasty? Urology. 2011;77(2):481–6.; Buckley JC, Patel N, Wang S, Liss M. National Trends in the Management of Urethral Stricture Disease: A 14-Year Survey of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Urol Pract. 2016;3(4):315–20.; Morey AF, Watkin N, Shenfeld O, Eltahawy E, Giudice C. SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: Anterior urethra - Primary anastomosis. Urology. 2014;83(3 SUPPL.):S23–6.; Aldaqadossi H, El Gamal S, El-Nadey M, El Gamal O, Radwan M, Gaber M. Dorsal onlay (Barbagli technique) versus dorsal inlay (Asopa technique) buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture: A prospective randomized study. International Journal of Urology. 2014;21(2):185–8.; Liu JS, Hofer MD, Oberlin DT, Milose J, Flury SC, Morey AF, et al. Practice Patterns in the Treatment of Urethral Stricture among American Urologists: A Paradigm Change? Urology. 2015;86(4):830–4.; Greenwell TJ, Castle C, Andrich DE, MacDonald JT, Nicol DL, Mundy AR. Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. J Urol. 2004;172(1):275–7; Gómez R, Marchetti P, Castillo OA. Rational and selective management of patients with anterior urethral stricture disease. Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35(3):159–66.; Spilotros M, Malde S, Solomon E, Grewal M, Mukhtar BM, Pakzad M, et al. Female urethral stricture: a contemporary series. World J Urol. 2017;35(6):991–5; Carr LK, Webster GD. Bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urologic Clinics of North America. 1996;23(3).; Hofer MD, Liu JS, Morey AF. Treatment of Radiation-Induced Urethral Strictures. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2017.; Ravikumar BR, Tejus C, Madappa KM, Prashant D, Dhayanand GS. A comparative study of ascending urethrogram and sono-urethrogram in the evaluation of stricture urethra. International Braz J Urol. 2015;41(2):388–92.; McAninch J, Laing F, Jeffrey RJr. Sonourethrography in the evaluation of urethral strictures: a preliminary report. Journal of Urology. 1988;139:294–7.; Sachse H. Zur Behandlung der Harnröhrenstriktur: Die transurethrale Schlitzung unter Sicht mit scharfem Schnitt. Fortschr Med. 1974;92:12–24.; Dutkiewicz S, Wroblewski M. Comparison of treatment results between holmium laser endourethrotomy and optical internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44:717–24.; Kamp S, Knoll T, Osman M, Köhrmann K, Michel M, Alken P. Low-power holmium:YAG laser urethrotomy for treatment of urethral strictures: functional outcome and quality of life. J Endourol. 2006;20(1):38–41.; Wessells H, McAninch J. Use of free grafts in urethral stricture reconstruction. J Urol. 1996;155:1912–5.; Bhargava S, Chapple C. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int. 2004;93:1191–3.; Dubey D, Kumar A, Mandhani A, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: a versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU Int. 2005;95:625–9.; Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term results of urethroplasty. Journal of Urology. 2003;170(1):90–2.; Andrich D, Mundy A. Surgery for stricture disease. Contemp Urol. 2001;13(12):32.; Erickson BA, Ghareeb GM. Definition of Successful Treatment and Optimal Follow-up after Urethral Reconstruction for Urethral Stricture Disease. Vol. 44, Urologic Clinics of North America. 2017. p. 1–9.; Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005 Feb;8(1):19–32.; Al-Hakeem Y, Chung A, Chung B, Tse V. Substitution urethroplasty for the treatment of male urethral stricture: Outcomes in an Australian center. LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 2019 Sep 1;11(4):211–6.; Zumstein V, Dahlem R, Kluth LA, Rosenbaum CM, Maurer V, Bahassan O, et al. A critical outcome analysis of Asopa single-stage dorsal inlay substitution urethroplasty for penile urethral stricture. World J Urol. 2020 May 1;38(5):1283–94.; Vetterlein MW, Kluth LA, Zumstein V, Meyer CP, Ludwig TA, Soave A, et al. Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for radiation-induced urethral strictures: an evaluation using the extended Urethral Stricture Surgery Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (USS PROM). World J Urol. 2020 Nov 1;38(11):2863–72.; D’Hulst P, Eeckt K vander, Aa F van der, Joniau S. Patient-reported functional outcomes after urethroplasty. Prospective analysis from a single center. European Urology Supplements [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 Oct 13];14(2):e953. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/20814139/953_Patient_reported_functional_outcomes_after_ure throplasty_Prospective_analysis_from_a_single_center; Warner JN, Malkawi I, Dhradkeh M, Joshi PM, Kulkarni SB, Lazzeri M, et al. A multi-institutional evaluation of the management and outcomes of long-segment urethral strictures. Urology. 2015 Jun 1;85(6):1483–8.; Rosenbaum CM, Schmid M, Ludwig TA, Kluth LA, Dahlem R, Fisch M, et al. Redo buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty: success rate, oral morbidity and functional outcomes. BJU Int. 2016 Nov 1;118(5):797–803.; Zumrutbas AE, Ozlulerden Y, Celen S, Kucuker K, Aybek Z. The outcomes of Kulkarni’s one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty in patients with panurethral stricture: a single centre experience. World J Urol. 2020 Jan 1;38(1):175–81.; Spilotros M, Sihra N, Malde S, Pakzad MH, Hamid R, Ockrim JL, et al. Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in men-risk factors for recurrence and complications: A third referral centre experience in anterior urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft. Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun 1;6(3):510–6.; Ali AI, Hamid AA, Abdel-Rassoul MA, Galal EM, Hasanein MGS, Hassan MAE, et al. Buccal mucosal graft versus penile skin flap urethroplasty for long segment penile urethral stricture: A prospective randomized study. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):191–7.; Levine LA, Strom KH, Lux MM. Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Stricture Repair: Evaluation of the Impact of Stricture Location and Lichen Sclerosus on Surgical Outcome. Journal of Urology. 2007 Nov;178(5):2011–5.; Policastro CG, Simhan J, Martins FE, Lumen N, Venkatesan K, Angulo JC, et al. A multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis. World J Urol. 2021 Jul 1;39(7):2669–75.; Zumstein V, Dahlem R, Maurer V, Marks P, Kluth LA, Rosenbaum CM, et al. Single-stage buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for meatal stenoses and fossa navicularis strictures: a 50 monocentric outcome analysis and literature review on alternative treatment options. World J Urol. 2020 Oct 1;38(10):2609–20.; Raber M, Naspro R, Scapaticci E, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Mazzoccoli B, et al. Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa for repair of bulbar urethral stricture: Results of a prospective single center study. Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):1013–7.; Ahyai SA, Schmid M, Kuhl M, Kluth LA, Soave A, Riechardt S, et al. Outcomes of Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty in Patients after Radiotherapy. Journal of Urology. 2015;194(2):441–6.; Singh B, Pathak H, Andankar M. Dorsolateral onlay urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures by a unilateral urethral mobilization approach. Indian Journal of Urology. 2009 Jul 1;25(2):211–4.; Daneshvar M, Simhan J, Blakely S, Angulo JC, Lucas J, Hunter C, et al. Transurethral ventral buccal mucosa graft inlay for treatment of distal urethral strictures: international multi-institutional experience. World J Urol. 2020 Oct 1;38(10):2601–7.; Mellon MJ, Bihrle R. Ventral onlay buccal mucosa urethroplasty: A 10-year experience. International Journal of Urology. 2014 Feb 1;21(2):190–3.; Dubey D, Kumar A, Mandhani A, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: A versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95(4):625–9.; Dubey D, Vijjan V, Kapoor R, Srivastava A, Mandhani A, Kumar A, et al. Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosa Versus Penile Skin Flap Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: Results From a Randomized Prospective Trial. Journal of Urology. 2007 Dec;178(6):2466–9.; Siegel JA, Panda A, Tausch TJ, Meissner M, Klein A, Morey AF. Repeat Excision and Primary Anastomotic Urethroplasty for Salvage of Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture. Journal of Urology. 2015 Nov 1;194(5):1316–22.; D’Hulst P, Floyd MS, Castiglione F, vander Eeckt K, Joniau S, van der Aa F, et al. Excision and Primary Anastomosis for Bulbar Urethral Strictures Improves Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life: A Prospective Analysis from a Single Centre. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Oct 13];2019. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6364126/; Keith CG, Davenport MT, Kavoussi M, Yi YA, Bergeson RL, Morey AF. Long-term outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty for radiation-induced strictures. World J Urol. 2020 Dec 1;38(12):3055–60.; Cooperberg MR, McAninch JW, Alsikafi NF, Elliott SP. Urethral Reconstruction for Traumatic Posterior Urethral Disruption: Outcomes of a 25-Year Experience. Journal of Urology. 2007 Nov;178(5):2006–10.; Kay HE, Srikanth P, Srivastava A v., Tijerina AN, Patel VR, Hauser N, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative factors predictive of complications and stricture recurrence following multiple urethroplasty techniques. BJUI Compass. 2021 Jul;2(4):286–91.; Han JS, Liu J, Hofer MD, Fuchs A, Chi A, Stein D, et al. Risk of urethral stricture recurrence increases over time after urethroplasty. International Journal of Urology. 2015 Jul 1;22(7):695–9.; Bertrand LA, Voelzke BB, Elliott SP, Myers JB, Breyer BN, Vanni AJ, et al. Measuring and Predicting Patient Dissatisfaction after Anterior Urethroplasty Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures. Journal of Urology. 2016 Aug 1;196(2):453–61.; Tam CA, Elliott SP, Voelzke BB, Myers JB, Vanni AJ, Breyer BN, et al. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Is an Inadequate Tool to Screen for Urethral Stricture Recurrence After Anterior Urethroplasty. Urology. 2016 Sep 1;95:197–201.; Granieri MA, Webster GD, Peterson AC. The evolution of urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture disease: Lessons learned from a single center experience. Journal of Urology. 2014 Nov 1;192(5):1468–72.; Choudhary AK, Jha NK. Is anastomotic urethroplasty is really superior than BMG augmented dorsal onlay urethroplasty in terms of outcomes and patient satisfaction: Our 4-year experience. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015 Jan 1;9(1–2):E22–6.; Delong J, Buckley J. Patient-reported outcomes combined with objective data to evaluate outcomes after urethral reconstruction. Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):432–6.; Glass AS, McAninch JW, Zaid UB, Cinman NM, Breyer BN. Urethroplasty after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2012;79(6):1402–6.; Lumen N, Spiers S, de Backer S, Pieters R, Oosterlinck W. Assessment of the short-term functional outcome after urethroplasty: a prospective analysis. International Braz J Uro. 2011;37(6):712–8.; Liu JS, Hofer MD, Oberlin DT, Milose J, Flury SC, Morey AF, et al. Practice Patterns in the Treatment of Urethral Stricture among American Urologists: A Paradigm Change? Urology. 2015 Oct 1;86(4):830–4.; Cotta BH, Buckley JC. Endoscopic Treatment of Urethral Stenosis. Vol. 44, Urologic Clinics of North America. W.B. Saunders; 2017. p. 19–25.; Greenwell TJ, Castle C, Andrich DE, MacDonald JT, Nicol DL, Mundy AR. Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. J Urol. 2004;172(1):275–7.; Tobar-Roa V, Ortiz-Zableh AM, Mantilla-Rey DJ, Sarmiento-Sarmiento G. Urethral reconstruction in a reference center in eastern Colombia. Urologia Colombiana. 2020;29(1):26–31.; Contreras-García R, García-Perdomo HA, Robayo-Ramirez J. Management of urethral stricture in tertiary centre in Colombia. Urologia Colombiana. 2017 May 1;26(2):98–103.; Zehri AA, Ather MH, Afshan Q. Predictors of recurrence of urethral stricture disease following optical urethrotomy. International Journal of Surgery. 2009;7(4):361–4.; Breyer BN, McAninch JW, Whitson JM, Eisenberg ML, Mehdizadeh JF, Myers JB, et al. Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Long-Term Urethroplasty Outcome. Journal of Urology. 2010 Feb;183(2):613–7.; Puche-Sanz I, Martín-Way D, Flores-Martín J, Expósito-Ruiz M, Vicente-Prados J, Nogueras-Ocaña M, et al. Validación psicométrica de la versión en castellano del cuestionario USS-PROM para pacientes sometidos a cirugía de uretra anterior. Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Jun 1;40(5):322–7.; Jackson MJ, Chaudhury I, Mangera A, Brett A, Watkin N, Chapple CR, et al. A Prospective Patient-centred Evaluation of Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Stricture Using a Validated Patient-reported Outcome Measure. Eur Urol. 2013 Nov 1;64(5):777–82.; Erickson BA, Elliott SP, Voelzke BB, Myers JB, Broghammer JA, Smith TG, et al. Multi-institutional 1-year bulbar urethroplasty outcomes using a standardized prospective cystoscopic follow-up protocol. Urology. 2014;84(1):213–7.; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/18661; instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB; reponame:Repositorio Institucional UNAB; repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
    • Online Access:
      https://doi.org/20.500.12749/18661
      https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/18661
    • Rights:
      http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ ; Abierto (Texto Completo) ; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.748A1358