Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

The collateral effect of a brief behavioural sleep intervention on chronotype for autistic children: A brief report

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Date:
      2025
    • Collection:
      The Open University: Figshare
    • Abstract:
      Background Autistic children have approximately twice the risk of developing sleep problems and greater likelihood of a later circadian rhythm preference (chronotype) compared to non-autistic peers, which together impact health and wellbeing. However, the interplay between underpinning biological, psychological, and environmental factors remains poorly understood. Methods This pilot study explored the collateral effect of a behavioural sleep intervention for autistic children without caregiver reported intellectual disability (n = 49, M age = 8.80 [2.14], 51 % female) on children’s chronotype (morningness/intermediate/eveningness) according to naturalistic melatonin use/non-use (65 %). Intervention group participants (n = 25) completed a brief three-session sleep intervention. All caregivers completed the Children’s Chronotype Questionnaire morningness/eveningness subscale (CCTQ) and Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) at baseline and three-months post-randomisation. Single case analyses compared reliable change for children with and without melatonin use. A Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test compared chronotype for each group pre- and post-intervention. Results The magnitude of change in chronotype score following intervention was greater for children not using melatonin. However, this difference was less marked for the sleep problem severity score. Fifty-seven percent of children had an eveningness chronotype at baseline. For the intervention group, there was a significant median change in chronotype category, z = 4.50, p = .013 with a reduction in eveningness chronotype from 15 to nine children. For the treatment as usual group there was no significant change, z = 10.50, p = 1.000. Conclusions These preliminary findings provide novel insight and suggest the potential collateral effect of behavioural sleep intervention on chronotype.
    • Relation:
      10779/DRO/DU:29976790.v1; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_collateral_effect_of_a_brief_behavioural_sleep_intervention_on_chronotype_for_autistic_children_A_brief_report/29976790
    • Online Access:
      https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_collateral_effect_of_a_brief_behavioural_sleep_intervention_on_chronotype_for_autistic_children_A_brief_report/29976790
    • Rights:
      CC BY 4.0
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.8FD2AF25