Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study of Self-administered Jacobson Relaxation in Chronic, Nonspecific, Low-back Pain

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      Departamentos de la UMH::Farmacología, Pediatría y Química Orgánica
    • Publication Information:
      InnoVision Communications
    • Publication Date:
      2018
    • Collection:
      RediUMH (Universidad Miguel Hernández)
    • Abstract:
      Context: Opioids decrease pain and improve functional capacity and quality of life; however, they are not always effective and are associated with harmful side effects. Few studies have shown that relaxation-based therapies, in comparison with usual care, can decrease pain. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate whether a controlled relaxation treatment, Jacobson progressive muscular relaxation (PMR), was effective in relieving chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and reducing pain comorbidities. The research team hypothesized that PMR-controlled relaxation could be more effective in reducing CLBP than music. Design: The research team designed a randomized, controlled, crossover study. Setting: The study took place in the pain unit, a clinic, in the Department of Health at Alicante-General Hospital (Alicante, Spain). Participants: Participants in this study were 58 adults with nononcological CLBP, secondary to lumbar canal stenosis, who had been treated with opioids without any changes in the 3 mo prior to the study. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups, each of which received 2 treatments, but in a different order (ie, either AB or BA where A was the standardized PMR, the intervention, and B was relaxing music, the control. For both groups, the 2 treatment periods were 8 wk in length, with a 1-mo washout period between them. Outcome measures: The primary outcome measures included (1) a visual analogue scale-pain and relief intensity; (2) the 12-item short form health survey-quality of life; (3) the hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety and depression; and (4) the medical outcomes study sleep scale-sleep disturbances. Secondary outcome measures included a self-efficacy scale and a measure of satisfaction with treatment and compliance. Results: Pain was mostly mild to moderate. Greater decreases in pain between baseline and postintervention were observed for the PMR vs the control treatment in the mild pain category, with a VAS difference of 1.8 cm and P = .018. ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • ISSN:
      1078-6791
    • Relation:
      Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2018 Nov;24(6):22-30; https://hdl.handle.net/11000/32358
    • Online Access:
      https://hdl.handle.net/11000/32358
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.92E3EB62