Abstract: Determining the penalty for offenders with regard to circumstantiality mitigation, including valuable gains of criminal law and its best examples refers to "personalization of penalty ", which developments in this field are recognized throughout history and influenced by the teachings of the neoclassical school and Social defense movement among legislators and judicial authorities. This legal entity with available judicial and legislative tools gives judges the possibility to determine sentence commuted based on the criteria such as physical and emotional state, economic - social and familial conditions. On the other hand, it seems that the commutation entity has been redefined in discursive space of this approach through influence of clinical approaches that are based on the belief of offender corrigibility, on the field of criminal law and tackle with penalty and intimidation approaches. This paper examines the norms, rules and principles governing circumstantiality mitigation in the context of clinical criminology theory regardless of committed crime. The present study was theoretical and by using analytical - descriptive method has studied mitigating measures of penalty in clinical criminology regardless of the nature and type of committed crime.
Rights: Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). ; Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать дополнительные соглашения о неэксклюзивном распространении работы в опубликованной в журнале версии (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище или публикацию в книге) со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать свою работу в сети Интернет (например, в институтском хранилище или на персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access). ; Autoři si ponechávají autorská práva na práci a poskytují časopisu právo prvního vydání časopisu pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution License, které umožňuje rozšiřovat tuto práci s povinným odkazy k původním autorům a původní publikaci v tomto časopisu.Autoři si ponechávají právo na další non-exkluzivní distribuční smlouvu o verzi práce, zveřejněné v odborném časopise (např. umístění ve vysokoškolském skladu nebo zveřejnění v knize), s odkazem k původní publikaci v tomto časopisu.Autoři mají právo umístit svou práci na internetu (např. v archivu ústavu nebo na osobních stránkách) před a během procesu posouzení tímto časopisem, protože to může vyvinout produktivní diskuzi a zvětšit počet odkazů k této práci (viz The Effect Open Access).
Processing Request
No Comments.