Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Migration of an intrauterine device: a case report ; Migração de dispositivo intrauterino: relato de caso

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Correia, Maria José; Magro Lopes, Ana
  • Source:
    Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 104-7 ; Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 38 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 104-7 ; Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 38 N.º 1 (2022): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 104-7 ; 2182-5181 ; 2182-5173 ; 10.32385/rpmgf.v38i1
  • Subject Terms:
  • Document Type:
    article in journal/newspaper
  • Language:
    Portuguese
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
    • Publication Date:
      2022
    • Collection:
      Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar (RPMGF)
    • Abstract:
      Introduction: Intrauterine contraceptive devices are a common method of long reversible contraception in women, widely inserted by general practitioners and gynecologists. Although being safe and reliable, these devices can lead to complications, such as perforation or abscess after insertion. There are over 1,000 cases described in the medical literature of intrauterine devices’ migration from the uterus to other locations, such as sigmoid colon or peritoneal cavity. Case description: We present the case of a 54 years old woman, from Guinea-Bissau, who presented with recurrent pelvic pain and dyspareunia, for 10 years. She was followed for four years in Gynecology. In the previous years, the patient had repeated and persistent dysuria and urinary urgency, along with positive urocultures and the presence of blood and leukocytes in urine. Despite the appropriate antibiotic treatment, the symptoms recurred. On further examination, gynecological and bladder ultrasounds were performed and a hyperdense structure compatible with an intrauterine contraceptive device was found inside the bladder. After referral to the Emergency Department of Urology, the diagnosis was confirmed and the intrauterine contraceptive device was then removed. Comment: In medical literature, almost all extra-uterine intrauterine devices (IUD) are due to migration. Patients with intrauterine devices ought to have regular follow-ups. If there is a suspicion of a “lost” intrauterine device, especially in a woman with chronic pelvic pain, dysuria, or recurrent urinary tract infections, a further radiologic examination is in order to rule out the rare, but possible, hypothesis of migration. ; Introdução: Os dispositivos intrauterinos (DIU) são um método contracetivo de longa duração, amplamente colocados por médicos de família e ginecologistas. Apesar de serem seguros e fiáveis existem possíveis complicações, como perfurações e abcessos associados à sua colocação. Na literatura estão descritos mais de mil casos de migração de DIU desde o útero até ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/13079/11750; https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/13079
    • Accession Number:
      10.32385/rpmgf.v38i1.13079
    • Online Access:
      https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/13079
      https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v38i1.13079
    • Rights:
      Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.A2F836F0