Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Adding some green to the greening: improving the EU's ecological focus areas for biodiversity and farmers

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung = Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ); German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development; Georg-August-University = Georg-August-Universität Göttingen; Coproducing Knowledge for Sustainability; Umweltbundesamt GmbH = Environment Agency Austria; Vegetation & Landscape Ecology; Universität Wien = University of Vienna; Institute of Ecology and Evolution; Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow (RAS); Haute école des sciences agronomiques, forestières et alimentaires (HAFL); Institut für Agrarökologie und Biodiversität (IFAB); Plant Ecology and Ecosystems Research; Dynamiques Forestières dans l'Espace Rural (DYNAFOR); Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-École nationale supérieure agronomique de Toulouse (ENSAT); Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP); Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP); Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT); Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt Klagenfurt, Austria; FPA EEA/NSV/14/001_ETC/ULS; ANR-11-EBID-0004,FarmLand,European Network on Farmland Heterogeneity, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services(2011)
    • Publication Information:
      HAL CCSD
      Wiley
    • Publication Date:
      2016
    • Collection:
      Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier: HAL-UPS
    • Abstract:
      Ecological Focus Areas (EFAs) are one of the three new greening measures of the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). We used an interdisciplinary and European-scale approach to evaluate ecological effectiveness and farmers‟ perception of the different EFA options. We assessed potential benefits of EFA options for biodiversity using a survey among 88 ecologists from 17 European countries. We further analyzed data on EFA uptake at the EU level and in eight EU Member States, and reviewed socio-economic factors influencing farmers‟ decisions. We then identified possible ways to improve EFAs. Ecologists scored field margins, buffer strips, fallow land, and landscape features as most beneficial whereas farmers mostly implemented „catch crops and green cover‟, nitrogen-fixing crops, and fallow land. Based on the expert inputs and a review of the factors influencing farmers‟ decisions, we suggest that EFA implementation could be improved by a) prioritizing EFA options that promote biodiversity (e.g. reducing the weight or even excluding ineffective options); b) reducing administrative constraints; c) setting stricter management requirements (e.g. limiting agrochemical use); and d) offering further incentives for expanding options like landscape features and buffer strips. We finally propose further improvements at the next CAP reform, to improve ecological effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
    • Relation:
      hal-01602794; https://hal.science/hal-01602794; https://hal.science/hal-01602794/document; https://hal.science/hal-01602794/file/2017_Peer_Conservation%20Letters_1.pdf; PRODINRA: 383314; WOS: 000412861500003
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/conl.12333
    • Online Access:
      https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12333
      https://hal.science/hal-01602794
      https://hal.science/hal-01602794/document
      https://hal.science/hal-01602794/file/2017_Peer_Conservation%20Letters_1.pdf
    • Rights:
      http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.A6FCCD9C