Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Exploiting nonlinear recurrence and fractal scaling properties for voice disorder detection

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      BioMed Central
    • Publication Date:
      2016
    • Collection:
      Oxford University Research Archive (ORA)
    • Abstract:
      Background: Voice disorders affect patients profoundly, and acoustic tools can potentially measure voice function objectively. Disordered sustained vowels exhibit wide-ranging phenomena, from nearly periodic to highly complex, aperiodic vibrations, and increased "breathiness". Modelling and surrogate data studies have shown significant nonlinear and non-Gaussian random properties in these sounds. Nonetheless, existing tools are limited to analysing voices displaying near periodicity, and do no account for this inherent biophysical nonlinearity and non-Gaussian randomness, often using linear signal processing methods insensitive to these properties. They do not directly measure the two main biophysical symptoms of disorder: complex nonlinear aperiodicity, and turbulent, aeroacoustic, non-Gaussian randomness. Often these tools cannot be applied to more severe disordered voices, limiting their clinical usefulness. Methods: This paper introduces two new tools to speech analysis: recurrence and fractal scaling, which overcome the range limitations of existing tools by addressing directly these two symptoms of disorder, together reproducing a "hoarseness" diagram. A simple bootstrapped classifier then uses these two features to distinguish normal from disordered voices. Results: On a large database of subjects with a wide variety of voice disorders, these new techniques can distinguish normal from disordered cases, using quadratic discriminant analysis, to overall correct classification performance of 91.8 ± 2.0%. The true positive classification performance is 95.4 ± 3.2%, and the true negative performance is 91.5 ± 2.3% (95% confidence). This is shown to outperform all combinations of the most popular classical tools. Conclusion: Given the very large number of arbitrary parameters and computational complexity of existing techniques, these new techniques are far simpler and yet achieve clinically useful classification performance using only a basic classification technique. They do so by exploiting the inherent ...
    • Relation:
      https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ea49f63e-0308-427d-83b9-e161696b8451; https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-6-23
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/1475-925X-6-23
    • Online Access:
      https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-6-23
      https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ea49f63e-0308-427d-83b9-e161696b8451
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; CC Attribution (CC BY)
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.ADB59E3D