Abstract: This paper critically engages with Michael Rubin’s analysis of Yemen, challenging its reliance on simplistic frameworks that overlook the country’s historical, tribal, and socio-political complexities. By examining Yemen through the lenses of local agency, regional power struggles, and global security narratives, the study highlights how reductionist interpretations often reinforce external agendas rather than capture realities on the ground. It offers a nuanced account of Yemen’s conflicts, situating them within broader debates on Middle Eastern politics, identity, and international relations.
No Comments.