Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Implementation of continuous quality improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health care in Australia: A scoping systematic review

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Springer Nature
    • Publication Date:
      2018
    • Collection:
      UNSW Sydney (The University of New South Wales): UNSWorks
    • Abstract:
      Background: Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) programs have been taken up widely by Indigenous primary health care (PHC) services in Australia and there has been national policy commitment to support this. However, international evidence shows that implementing CQI is challenging, impacts are variable and little is known about the factors that impede or enhance effectiveness. A scoping review was undertaken to explore uptake and implementation in Indigenous PHC, including barriers and enablers to embedding CQI in routine practice. We provide guidance on how research and evaluation might be intensified to support implementation. Methods: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Key websites and publications were handsearched. Studies conducted in Indigenous PHC which demonstrated some combination of CQI characteristics and assessed some aspect of implementation were included. A two stage analysis was undertaken. Stage 1 identified the breadth and focus of literature. Stage 2 investigated barriers and enablers. The Framework for Performance Assessment in PHC (2008) was used to frame the analysis. Data were extracted on the study type, approach, timeframes, CQI strategies, barriers and enablers. Results: Sixty articles were included in Stage 1 and 21 in Stage 2. Barriers to implementing CQI processes relate primarily to professional and organisational processes and operate at multiple levels (individual, team, service, health system) whereas barriers to improved care relate more directly to knowledge of best practice and team processes that facilitate appropriate care. Few studies described implementation timeframes, number of CQI cycles or improvement strategies implemented and only two applied a change theory. Conclusion: Investigating barriers and enablers that modify implementation and impacts of CQI poses conceptual and methodological challenges. More complete description of CQI processes, implementation strategies, and barriers and enablers could enhance ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_79580; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/9724e37e-91ea-4288-988b-418037e01da5/download; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/a957ce99-ce28-439e-9082-f3c7c1f58d96/download; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3308-2
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12913-018-3308-2
    • Online Access:
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3308-2
      http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/unsworks_79580
      https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/9724e37e-91ea-4288-988b-418037e01da5/download
      https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/bitstreams/a957ce99-ce28-439e-9082-f3c7c1f58d96/download
    • Rights:
      open access ; https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 ; CC BY ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ; free_to_read
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.C7B2B465