Neoskolastičko promišljanje oca Rudolfa Brajičića, isusovca, o filozofiji Immanuela Kanta ; Neoscholastic Thinking of Father Rudolf Brajičić, Jesuit, on Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy

U ovom radu izlažu se najosnovnije misli, zapažanja i idejne smjernice oca Rudolfa Brajičića o problematici filozofije Immanuela Kanta. Temeljna polazišta za ta promišljanja, prije svega, mogu se naći u djelima oca Brajičića: Opravdanje čistoga uma i Filozofski eksperiment. Problematika ima za polazište i težište mogućnost sintetičkih sudova a priori, razliku između analitičkih i sintetičkih sudova a priori, te percepcije i (ne)prihvaćanja sintetičkih sudova a priori u neoskolastici (npr. Vilim Keilbach, Stjepan Zimmermann, Miljenko Belić od domaćih neoskolastika ili npr. Joseph Maréchal i Johannes Baptist Lotz od stranih neoskolastika). Naime, čini se da o. Brajičić u mogućnosti prihvaćanja sintetičkih sudova a priori vidi mogućnost kritike Kantove filozofije. ; This paper presents the most basic thoughts, observations, and conceptual guidelines of Father Rudolf Brajičić on the issue of Immanuel Kant’s philosophy. The fundamental starting points for these reflections can be found, first of all, in the works of Father Brajičić: Opravdanje čistoga uma and Filozofski eksperiment. The starting point and focus of the issue is the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments, the difference between analytic and synthetic a priori judgments, and the perception and (non)acceptance of synthetic a priori judgments in neo-scholasticism (e.g. Vilim Keilbach, Stjepan Zimmermann, Miljenko Belić from domestic neo-scholasticism or e.g. Joseph Maréchal and Johannes Baptist Lotz from foreign neo-scholasticism). It seems that Father Brajičić sees in the possibility of accepting synthetic a priori judgments a possibility of criticizing Kant’s philosophy.