Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Does Exposure to Pictures of Nature Boost Attentional Control in the Stroop task?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Contributors:
      Centre de recherches sur les fonctionnements et les dysfonctionnements psychologiques (CRFDP); Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN); Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société (IRIHS); Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN); Normandie Université (NU); Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA); Centre d’études des transformations des activités physiques et sportives (CETAPS); Bournemouth University Poole (BU); RIN Tremplin Grant 19E00851 of Normandie Région, France; ANR-19-CE28-0013,OptiCog,Optimiser la compréhension des capacités de contrôle cognitif au travers de l'interférence Stroop : étude comportementale, e´lectrophysiologique et en IRMf de ses différentes composantes(2019)
    • Publication Information:
      HAL CCSD
      Elsevier
    • Publication Date:
      2022
    • Collection:
      Normandie Université: HAL
    • Abstract:
      International audience ; Attention Restoration Theory (ART) argues that natural environments, or stimuli associated with natural environments, can restore reduced inhibitory capacity. ART has received support from studies showing that the Stroop congruency effect (incongruent - congruent trial RTs) is reduced following exposure to nature. Given that the Stroop congruency effect conflates interference (inhibition), facilitation and response contingency effects, these previous studies have not tested the central tenet of ART. Therefore, the present study was designed to a) unambiguously assess the extent to which exposure to pictures of nature (vs. control pictures) reduces Stroop interference (incongruent-color - neutral trial RTs; i.e., prima facie evidence for restored inhibition/attentional control); b) shed additional light on cognitive processes involved in this reduction. In line with past studies, pictures of nature were perceived as more restorative compared to control pictures. However, despite being appropriately powered and showing typical Stroop findings, the present study failed to provide evidence that exposure to these restorative pictures (as opposed to control pictures) actually reduces Stroop interference: Bayesian evidence against this reduction was provided in both errors and in reaction times and this conclusion was also reinforced by sequential analyses. Consequently, the present results indicate that exposing individuals to pictures of nature is not effective for replenishing inhibitory control in the Stroop task.
    • Relation:
      hal-03832187; https://hal.science/hal-03832187; https://hal.science/hal-03832187/document; https://hal.science/hal-03832187/file/Augustinova%20et%20al-JEVP-2022-Final.pdf
    • Accession Number:
      10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101901
    • Online Access:
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101901
      https://hal.science/hal-03832187
      https://hal.science/hal-03832187/document
      https://hal.science/hal-03832187/file/Augustinova%20et%20al-JEVP-2022-Final.pdf
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.D89629D