Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Disclosing possible nonmedically indicated cesarean sections in 5 high-volume urban maternity units in Tanzania:a criterion-based clinical audit

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Date:
      2025
    • Collection:
      Aarhus University: Research
    • Abstract:
      Background: Globally, the cesarean section rate has increased dramatically with many cesarean sections being performed on questionable medical indications. Particularly in urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa, the cesarean section rate is currently increasing rapidly. This potentially undermines the positive momentum of increased facility births and may be a central contributor to a growing "urban disadvantage" in maternal and perinatal health, which is seen in some settings. Objective: To assess to what extent cesarean section indications follow evidence-based, locally co-created audit criteria in five urban, high-volume maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and identify reasons contributing to nonmedically indicated cesarean sections. Study Design: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted, from October 1st, 2021 to August 31st, 2022. A criterion-based audit with pre-defined, localized audit criteria was used to examine the clinical case-files of all women who gave birth by cesarean section during 3-month periods at the 5 maternity units. Primary outcomes were the cesarean section rate, indications for cesarean section, and proportion of nonmedically indicated cesarean sections. The PartoMa study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04685668). Results: Overall, the cesarean section rate was 31.5% (2949/9364), of which 2674/2949 (90.7%) cesarean sections had available data for analysis. Main indications were previous cesarean section (1133/2674; 42.4%), prolonged labor (746/2674; 27.9%), and fetal distress (554/2674; 20.7%). Overall, 1061/2674 (39.7%) did not comply with audit criteria at the time cesarean section was decided. Main reasons were one previous cesarean section with no trial of labor (526/1061; 49.6%); reported prolonged labor without actual slow progress (243/1061; 22.9%); and fetal distress with normal fetal heart rate at time of decision (211/1061; 19.9%). Conclusion: Two in 5 cesarean sections were categorized as nonmedically indicated at time of decision. Particularly, ...
    • ISSN:
      2666-5778
    • Relation:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/39898001; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/2666-5778; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2666-5778
    • Accession Number:
      10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100437
    • Online Access:
      https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/7bc78525-1551-430c-b455-c2b906332d68
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100437
      https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215373457
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    • Accession Number:
      edsbas.EFA7C771