Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Does Control-Related Information Attenuate Biased Self-Control and Moral Perceptions Based on Weight?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      MDPI AG, 2025.
    • Publication Date:
      2025
    • Collection:
      LCC:Psychology
    • Abstract:
      Negative weight-based attitudes are pervasive and difficult to change. One reason may be the moralization of weight: if people use higher weight as a cue for lower self-control, they may infer lower moral character, given the strong link between self-control and morality. Moralized attitudes tend to be resistant to change. Accordingly, we tested whether (1) people perceived others with higher (vs. lower) weight as having lower self-control and, in turn, morality and (2) whether targeting control-related perceptions attenuated the weight → self-control → morality links. To that end, in two preregistered experiments (see OSF), we employed intervention strategies targeting control-related perceptions to increase moral evaluations of higher-weight individuals. Specifically, we provided evidence of a higher-weight person’s (a) weight uncontrollability (Study 1) and (b) high self-control (Study 2). People perceived higher-weight targets as having lower self-control, and this predicted perceptions of lower moral character. However, as with extant weight-based attitude interventions, neither experimental intervention strategy attenuated less positive (i.e., made more positive) moral character perceptions. These findings suggest that it is not enough to intervene on control-related beliefs to reduce the moralization of weight. We suggest intervening on moral perceptions directly and the possibility that moralization of weight may be automatic, requiring interventions targeting automatic attitudes.
    • File Description:
      electronic resource
    • ISSN:
      2076-328X
    • Relation:
      https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/7/970; https://doaj.org/toc/2076-328X
    • Accession Number:
      10.3390/bs15070970
    • Accession Number:
      edsdoj.34302f4567469298da9ee25a1586af