Abstract: The following essay intends to test the convenience of either keeping a disperse regime in Colombia, or to opt for a positive one with a systematic character with regards to restrictive clauses of public and private liability. The aforementioned will be seen from the viewpoint of compared Law where the main aspects of the only two attempts of reforming the existing regime will be regarded, as well as under the observation of the legislative proposals that have intended to reform the consumer’s statute in the last decade.
No Comments.