Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Dose Response vs. Conventional Dosing of Propofol for Anesthesia Induction Under Bispectral Index Monitoring: A Clinical Trial

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2024.
    • Publication Date:
      2024
    • Collection:
      LCC:Medicine (General)
    • Abstract:
      Propofol is an advantageous agent for anesthesia induction. It can cause dose-related hemodynamic adverse effects. The bispectral index (BIS) is a brain function monitor utilized to assess the depth of anesthesia. This study aimed to compare the adverse hemodynamic effects of BIS-guided response dosing with conventional weight-based dosing of Propofol. In this clinical trial, patients were anesthetized with propofol in two different orthopedic operating rooms. In one operating room, patients received propofol with dose-response method (group A), and the other received weight-based dosing (group B). For both groups, BIS was used as an index of anesthesia depth. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, during induction, and at different time points. A total of 73 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean dose of propofol for induction was higher in the control group than in the response-guided group (1.94±1.65 vs. 1.09±0.32, respectively, P=0.006). There were no reported significant adverse hemodynamic effects in patients of the two groups. Response-guided propofol dosing can be used to decrease propofol dose during anesthesia induction. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical benefit of this dosing strategy.
    • File Description:
      electronic resource
    • ISSN:
      0044-6025
      1735-9694
    • Relation:
      https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/11017; https://doaj.org/toc/0044-6025; https://doaj.org/toc/1735-9694
    • Accession Number:
      10.18502/acta.v61i9.15287
    • Accession Number:
      edsdoj.b5de26b63574a26a36182d09d5e3145