Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparison of the Prophylactic Effect of Propofol, Dexamethasone and Ondansetron on Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2021.
    • Publication Date:
      2021
    • Collection:
      LCC:Medicine (General)
    • Abstract:
      Nausea and vomiting are common complications in women undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. This study aimed to compare the propofol, dexamethasone, and ondansetron effects on nausea and vomiting. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial study, 120 women aged 15 to 35 years candidates for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into four groups (three-drug groups and the control group). Patients received 0.05 mg /kg ondansetron (group O), 0.1 mg /kg dexamethasone (group D), 0.2 mg/kg propofol (group P) and normal saline in controls (group C). Nausea and vomiting in recovery and 6 hours after surgery compared between groups. In recovery and 6 hours after surgery, both nausea and vomiting were the highest in group C while they were lowest in group O. the frequency of nausea was 11(36.7%) in both recovery and 6 hours after surgery and the frequency of vomiting was 12(40%) and 10(33.3%) in the recovery and 6 hours after surgery respectively. Among the three drug groups, nausea and vomiting were higher in group D in both recovery rooms and 6 hours after surgery. The frequency of vomiting was 10 (33.3%) and 5 (16.7%) in recovery and 6 hours after surgery in group D respectively. these differences were statistically significant between the four groups (p
    • File Description:
      electronic resource
    • ISSN:
      0044-6025
      1735-9694
    • Relation:
      https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/9386; https://doaj.org/toc/0044-6025; https://doaj.org/toc/1735-9694
    • Accession Number:
      10.18502/acta.v59i12.8059
    • Accession Number:
      edsdoj.f75303c71fed41eea2dc4eb5a08c2aaf