Method for regulating gene expression

11739,313

16/756935

October 19, 2018

A method of modifying an upstream open reading frame (uORF) by genome editing technique to regulate gene expression.

INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (Beijing, CN); TIANJIN GENOVO BIOTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (Tianjin, CN)

INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (Beijing, CN), TIANJIN GENOVO BIOTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (Tianjin, CN)

1. A method for regulating expression of a target protein in a plant cell, wherein the 5′ untranslated region (5′-UTR) of the encoding gene of said target protein comprises an upstream open reading frame (uORF), wherein the method comprises introducing into the plant cell a genome editing system that targets the uORF, thereby increasing or decreasing or eliminating inhibition of target protein expression by the uORF, wherein the introduction of the genome editing system that targets the uORF results in mutation of one or more nucleotides in the uORF, and wherein (i) the mutation of one or more nucleotides results in a weak translation initiation codon in the uORF being mutated into a strong translation initiation codon, whereby inhibition of target protein expression by the uORF is enhanced and target protein expression level is reduced, or (ii) the mutation of one or more nucleotides results in a strong translation initiation codon in the uORF being mutated into a weak translation initiation codon, or the mutation results in the uORF not being translated, whereby inhibition of target protein expression by the uORF is reduced and target protein expression level is increased, and wherein the strong translation initiation codon is ATG, and the weak translation initiation codon is selected from the group consisting of GTG, ATC, ACG, TTG or AAG.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the genome editing system is selected from the group consisting of a precise base editing (PBE) system, a CRISPR-Cas9 system, a CRISPR-Cpf1 system, a CRISPRi system, a zinc finger nuclease system, and TALEN system.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plant cell is a cell of plants including monocots and dicots, such as a cell of rice, corn, wheat, sorghum, barley, soybean, peanut, Arabidopsis thaliana, Lactuca sativa.

4. A plant cell engineered by the method of claim 1 , wherein the expression level of the target protein in the plant cell is altered relative to an unmodified plant cell.

5. A method of producing a genetically modified plant, comprising the step of regenerating an intact plant from the cell of claim 4 , wherein the expression level of the target protein in the genetically modified plant is altered relative to a plant that has not been genetically modified.

101768591 July 2010
103642931 March 2014
104884622 September 2015
01/96569 December 2001
02/20789 March 2002
2016/116032 July 2016

Kolli, N. et al. International Journal of Molecular Sciences (Apr. 2017) vol. 118, No. 754, pp. 1-14. (Year: 2017). cited by examiner
Laing, W.A. et al. (Mar. 2015) The Plant Cell; vol. 27: 772-786. (Year: 2016). cited by examiner
Mehdi, H. et al. Gene (1990) 173-178. (Year: 1990). cited by examiner
Laing, W.A. et al. The Plant Cell, vol. 27: 772-786; Mar. 2015. (Year: 2015). cited by examiner
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/CN2018/110928 dated Jan. 30, 2019. cited by applicant
Nivya Kolli et al., “CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Gene-Silencing of the Mutant Huntingtin Gene in an In Vitro Model of Huntington's Disease”, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, No. 4, Apr. 2, 2017 (Apr. 2, 2017). cited by applicant
Shan, Q. et al. “Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system”, Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686-688 (2013). cited by applicant
Tang et al., “A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants,” Nature Plants 3, 17018 (2017), 5 pages. cited by applicant
Seth and Harish, “Current status of potential applications of repurposed Cas9 for structural and functional genomics of plants,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 480, Issue 4, Nov. 25, 2016, pp. 499-507. cited by applicant
Zong et al., “Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion,” Nat Biotechnol 35, 438-440 (2017). cited by applicant
Shukla et al., “Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases,” Nature 459, 437-441 (2009). cited by applicant
Townsend et al., “High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases,” Nature 459, 442-445 (2009). cited by applicant
Li et al., “High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice,” Nat Biotechnol 30, 390-392 (2012). cited by applicant
Hanfrey et al., “Abrogation of Upstream Open Reading Frame-mediated Translational Control of a Plant S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase Results in Polyamine Disruption and Growth Peturbations”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2002, vol. 277, No. 46, pp. 44131-44139. cited by applicant
Imai et al., “The dwarf phenotype of the Arabidopsis acl5 mutant is suppressed by a mutation in an upstream ORF of a bHLH gene”, Development, 2006, vol. 133, No. 18, pp. 3575-3585. cited by applicant
Guerrero-Gonzalez et al., “Arabidopsis Polyamine oxidase-2 uORF is required for downstream translational regulation”, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, vol. 108, pp. 381-390. cited by applicant
Schwanhausser et al., “Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control”, Nature, 2011, vol. 473, pp. 337-342. cited by applicant
Calvo et al., “Upstream open reading frames cause widespread reduction of protein expression and are polymorphic among humans”, PNAS, 2009, vol. 106, No. 18, pp. 7507-7512. cited by applicant
Von Arnim et al., “Regulation of plant translation by upstream open reading frames”, Plant Science, 2014, vol. 214, pp. 1-12. cited by applicant
Hellens et al., “Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants”, Plant Methods, 2005, vol. 1, No. 13, 14 pages. cited by applicant
Kawakami et al., “TTG as the Initiation Codon of Salmonella slyA, a Gene Required for Survival within Macrophages”, Microbiol Immunol., 1999, vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 351-357. cited by applicant
Mehdi et al., “Initiation of translation at CUG, GUG, and ACG codons in mammalian cells”, Gene, 1990, vol. 91, pp. 173-178. cited by applicant
Laing et al.,“An Upstream Open Reading Frame Is Essential for Feedback Regulation of Ascorbate Biosynthesis In Arabidopsis”, The Plant Cell, 2015, vol. 27, pp. 772-786. cited by applicant
Bulley et al., “Enhancing ascorbate in fruits and tubers through over-expression of the L-galactose pathway gene GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase”, Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2012, vol. 10, pp. 390-397. cited by applicant
Zhou et al., “Engineering ascorbic acide biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis leaves by single and double gene transformation”, Biologica Plantarum, 2012, vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 451-457. cited by applicant
Reyes-Chin-Wo et al., “Genome assembly with in vitro proximity ligation data and whole-genome triplication in lettuce”, Nature Communications, 2017, vol. 8, Article 14953, 11 pages. cited by applicant
Zhang et al., “Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA”, Nature Communications, 2016, vol. 7, Article 12617, 8 pages. cited by applicant
Liang et al., “Efficient DNA-Free genome editing of bread wheat using CR1SPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes”, Nature Communications, 2017, vol. 8, Article 14261, 5 pages. cited by applicant
Yan et al., “High-Efficiency Genome Editing in Arabidopsis Using YAO Promoter-Driven CRISPR/Cas9 System”, Molecular Plant, 2015, vol. 8, pp. 1820-1823. cited by applicant
Xing et al., “A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants”, BMC Plant Biology, 2014, vol. 14, No. 327, 12 pages. cited by applicant
Zhai et al., “Isolation of Protoplasts from Tissues of 14-day-old Seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana”, Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2009, 30, pii: 1149. doi: 10.3791/1149. cited by applicant
Yoo et al., “Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis”, Nature Protocols, 2007, vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 1565-1572. cited by applicant
Cui et al., “Arabidopsis Ubiquitin Conjugase UBC32 Is an ERAD Component That Functions in Brassinosteroid-Mediated Salt Stress Tolerance”, The Plant Cell, 2012, vol. 24, pp. 233-244. cited by applicant
Zhang et al., “The RING Finger Ubiquitin E3 Ligase SDIR1 Targets SDIR1-Interacting Protein1 for Degradation to Modulate the Salt Stress Response and ABA Signaling in Arabidopsis”, The Plant Cell, 2015, vol. 27, pp. 214-227. cited by applicant
Kovács et al., “Quantitative Determination of Ascorbate from the Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by HPLC”, Bio-protocol, 2016, vol. 6, Issue 24, e2067, 7 pages. cited by applicant
Liang et al., “Translation efficiency of mRNAs is Increased by antisense oligonucleotides targeting upstream open reading frames”, Nature Biotechnology, 2016, vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 875-882. cited by applicant
Xu et al., “Global translational reprogramming is a fundamental layer of immune regulation in plants”, Nature, 2017, vol. 545, pp. 487-490. cited by applicant
Wang et al., “BRI1 is a critical component of a plasma-membrane receptor for plant steroids”, Letters to Nature, 2001, vol. 410, pp. 380-383. cited by applicant
Woo et al., “DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassambled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins”, Nature Biotechnology, 2015, vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1162-1164. cited by applicant

edspgr.11739313