System and method for quantitative parameter mapping using magnetic resonance images

12181,554

18/067489

December 16, 2022

A system for quantitative parameter mapping using magnetic resonance (MR) image includes an input for receiving a plurality of weighted MR images of a subject and a corresponding at least one imaging parameter for the plurality of weighted MR images, and a quantitative parameter mapping neural network coupled to the input and configured to estimate at least one tissue parameter and generate at least one quantitative map for the at least one tissue parameter based on the plurality of weighted MR images of the subject and the corresponding at least one imaging parameter. The quantitative parameter mapping neural network can be trained using a set of training data utilizing at least one confounder for the quantification of the at least one tissue parameter. The system can further include a display coupled to the quantitative parameter mapping neural network to display the at least one quantitative map.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc. (Boston, MA, US)

BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (Boston, MA, US)

1. A system for quantitative parameter mapping using magnetic resonance (MR) images, the system comprising: an input for receiving a plurality of weighted MR images of a subject and a corresponding at least one imaging parameter for the plurality of weighted MR images; a quantitative parameter mapping neural network coupled to the input and configured to estimate at least one tissue parameter and generate at least one quantitative map for the at least one tissue parameter based on the plurality of weighted MR images of the subject and the corresponding at least one imaging parameter for the plurality of weighted MR images, wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data utilizing at least one confounder for the quantification of the at least one tissue parameter; and a display coupled to the quantitative parameter mapping neural network and configured to display the at least one quantitative map.

2. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of weighed MR images are one of multi-contrast weighted images, T 1 -weighted images, T 2 -weighted images, T 2 *-weighted images and T 1 p-weighted images.

3. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one tissue parameter is one of T 1 , T 2 , T 2 *, or T 1 p.

4. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is a fully compensated (FC) neural network.

5. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is an encoder-decoder neural network with skip connections.

6. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data comprising a combination of native and post-contrast MR data.

7. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data comprising a combination of numerically simulated MR data and MR phantom data.

8. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one confounder is one of angle, heart rate, B 0 , B 1 , or off-resonance.

9. A method for quantitative parameter mapping using magnetic resonance (MR) images, the method comprising acquiring, using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, MR data from a subject for a plurality of weighted images using a pulse sequence; generating a plurality of weighted MR images of a subject from the acquired MR data, each of the plurality of weighted MR images having a corresponding at least one imaging parameter; providing, using a processor, the plurality of weighted MR images of the subject and the corresponding at least one imaging parameter for the plurality of weighted MR images to a quantitative parameter mapping neural network, wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data utilizing at least one confounder for the quantification of the at least one tissue parameter; generating, using the quantitative parameter mapping neural network, an estimate of at least one tissue parameter and at least one quantitative map for the at least one tissue parameter based on the plurality of weighted MR images of the subject and the corresponding at least one imaging parameter for the plurality of weighted MR images; and displaying, using a display, the at least one quantitative map.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the plurality of weighed MR images are one of multi-contrast weighted images, T 1 -weighted images, T 2 -weighted images, T 2 *-weighted images, and T 1 p-weighted images.

11. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the at least one tissue parameter is one of T 1 , T 2 , T 2 *, or T 1 p.

12. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is a fully connected (FC) neural network.

13. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is an encoder-decoder neural network with skip connections.

14. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data comprising a combination of native and post-contrast MR data.

15. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the quantification parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data comprising a combination of numerically simulated MR data and MR phantom data.

16. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the at least one confounder is one of angle, heart rate, B 0 , B 1 , or off-resonance.

17. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system comprising: a magnet system configured to generate a polarizing magnetic field about at least a portion of a subject; a magnetic gradient system including a plurality of magnetic gradient coils configured to apply at least one magnetic gradient field to the polarizing magnetic field; a radio frequency (RF) system configured to apply an RF field to the subject and to receive magnetic resonance signals from the subject using a coil array; and a computer system programmed to acquire MR data from a subject for a plurality of weighted images using a pulse sequence; generate a plurality of weighted MR images of a subject from the acquired MR data, each of the plurality of weighted MR images having a corresponding at least one imaging parameter; provide the plurality of weighted MR images of the subject and the corresponding at least one imaging parameter for the plurality of weighted MR images to a quantitative parameter mapping neural network, wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data utilizing at least one confounder for the quantification of the at least one tissue parameter; and generate, using the quantitative parameter mapping neural network, an estimate of at least one tissue parameter and at least one quantitative map for the at least one tissue parameter based on the plurality of weighted MR images of the subject and the corresponding at least one imaging parameter for the plurality of weighted MR images.

18. The MRI system according to claim 17 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is a fully connected (FC) neural network.

19. The MRI system according to claim 17 , wherein the quantitative parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data comprising a combination of native and post-contrast MR data.

20. The MRI system according to claim 17 , wherein the quantification parameter mapping neural network is trained using a set of training data comprising a combination of numerically simulated MR data and MR phantom data.

11948676 April 2024 Xing
2021/0223343 July 2021 Koerzdoerfer
2021/0239780 August 2021 Fan

Kellman P, Xue H, Chow K, Spottiswoode BS, Arai AE, Thompson RB. Optimized saturation recovery protocols for T1-mapping in the heart: influence of sampling strategies on precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014; 16(55). cited by applicant
Kvernby S, Warntjes M, Engvall J, Carlhäll CJ, Ebbers T. Clinical feasibility of 3D-QALAS—Single breath-hold 3D myocardial T1- and T2-mapping. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;38:13-20. cited by applicant
Kvernby S, Warntjes MJ a. B, Haraldsson H, Carlhäll CJ, Engvall J, Ebbers T. Simultaneous three-dimensional myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in one breath hold with 3D-QALAS. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2014;16:102. cited by applicant
Leiner T, Rueckert D, Suinesiaputra A, Baessler B, Nezafat R, Isgum I, Young AA. Machine learning in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: basic concepts and applications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2019;21(1):61. cited by applicant
Li Y, Wu J and Wu Q (2019) Classification of breast cancer histology images using multi-size and discriminative patches based on deep learning, IEEE Access 7 21400-8. cited by applicant
Liu X, Faes L, Kale A U, Wagner S K, Fu D J, Bruynseels A, Mahendiran T, Moraes G, Shamdas M and Kern C (2019) A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis, The lancet digital health 1 e271-e97. cited by applicant
Mehta BB, Chen X, Bilchick KC, Salerno M, Epstein FH. Accelerated and navigator-gated look-locker imaging for cardiac T1 estimation (ANGIE): Development and application to T1 mapping of the right ventricle. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;73:150-160. cited by applicant
Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, Grosse-Wortmann L, He T, Kellman P, Mascherbauer J, Nezafat R, Salerno M, Schelbert EB, Taylor AJ, Thompson R, Ugander M, van Heeswijk RB, Friedrich MG. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017; 19(1):75. cited by applicant
Messroghli DR, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S, Higgins DM, Sivananthan MU, Ridgway JP. Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magn Reson Med 2004;52(1):141-146. cited by applicant
Mozes FE, Tunnicliffe EM, Pavlides M, Robson MD. Influence of fat on liver T1 measurements using modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) methods at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44(1):105-111. cited by applicant
Nezafat M, El-Rewaidy H, Kucukseymen S, Hauser TH, Fahmy AS. Deep convolution neural networks based artifact suppression in under-sampled radial acquisitions of myocardial T 1 mapping images. Phys Med Biol 2020;65 (22):225024. cited by applicant
Nordio G, Bustin A, Henningsson M, et al. 3D Sasha myocardial T1 mapping with high accuracy and improved precision. Magn. Reson. Mater. Physics, Biol. Med. 2019;32:281-289. cited by applicant
Nordio G, Bustin A, Odille F, et al. Faster 3D saturation-recovery based myocardial T1 mapping using a reduced number of saturation points and denoising. PLoS One 2020;15. cited by applicant
Nordio G, Henningsson M, Chiribiri A, Villa ADM, Schneider T, Botnar RM. 3D myocardial T1 mapping using saturation recovery. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:218-227. cited by applicant
Nordio G, Schneider T, Cruz G, et al. Whole-heart T1 mapping using a 2D fat image navigator for respiratory motion compensation. Magn. Reson. Med. 2020;83:178-187. cited by applicant
Pascanu, Razvan, Tomas Mikolov, and Yoshua Bengio. “On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks.” International conference on machine learning. Pmlr, 2013. cited by applicant
Piechnik SK, Ferreira VM, Dall'Armellina E, et al. Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1 mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2010;12:69. cited by applicant
Puntmann VO, Peker E, Chandrashekhar Y, Nagel E. T1 Mapping in Characterizing Myocardial Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Circ Res 2016; 119(2):277-299. cited by applicant
Qi H, Bustin A, Cruz G, et al. Free-running simultaneous myocardial T1/T2 mapping and cine imaging with 3D whole- heart coverage and isotropic spatial resolution. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;63:159-169. cited by applicant
Qi H, Jaubert O, Bustin A, et al. Free-running 3D whole heart myocardial T1 mapping with isotropic spatial resolution. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;82:1331-1342. cited by applicant
Robson MD, Piechnik SK, Tunnicliffe EM, Neubauer S. T1 measurements in the human myocardium: the effects of magnetization transfer on the SASHA and MOLLI sequences. Magn Reson Med 2013;70(3):664-670. cited by applicant
Roes SD, Korosoglou G, Schar M, Westenberg JJ, van Osch MJ, de Roos A, Stuber M. Correction for heart rate variability during 3D whole heart MR coronary angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27(5):1046-1053. cited by applicant
Ronneberger, Olaf, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation.” Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention-MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, Oct. 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18. Springer International Publishing, 2015. cited by applicant
Roujol S, Basha TA, Weingärtner S, et al. Impact of motion correction on reproducibility and spatial variability of quantitative myocardial T2 mapping. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2015;17:46. cited by applicant
Roujol S, Foppa M, Weingartner S, Manning WJ, Nezafat R. Adaptive registration of varying contrast-weighted images for improved tissue characterization (ARCTIC): application to T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med 2015;73(4):1469-1482. cited by applicant
Roujol S, Weingärtner S, Foppa M, et al. Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of four T1 mapping sequences: A headto-head comparison of Molli, ShMolli, Sasha, and Sapphire. Radiology 2014;272:683-689. cited by applicant
Salerno M, Kramer CM. Advances in parametric mapping with CMR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6 (7):806-822. cited by applicant
Santini F, Kawel-Boehm N, Greiser A, Bremerich J, Bieri O. Simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification of the myocardium using cardiac balanced-SSFP inversion recovery with interleaved sampling acquisition (CABIRIA). Magn Reson Med 2015;74(2):365-371. cited by applicant
Schelbert EB, Testa SM, Meier CG, Ceyrolles WJ, Levenson JE, Blair AJ, Kellman P, Jones BL, Ludwig DR, Schwartzman D, Shroff SG, Wong TC. Myocardial extravascular extracellular vol. fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:16. cited by applicant
Shao J, Ghodrati V, Nguyen KL, Hu P. Fast and accurate calculation of myocardial T(1) and T(2) values using deep learning Bloch equation simulations (DeepBLESS). Magn Reson Med 2020;84(5):2831-2845. cited by applicant
Shao J, Liu D, Sung K, Nguyen KL, Hu P. Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of myocardial T1 mapping: A comparison of four T1 estimation algorithms for modified looklocker inversion recovery (MOLLI). Magn. Reson. Med. 2017;78:1746-1756. cited by applicant
Shao J, Nguyen KL, Natsuaki Y, Spottiswoode B, Hu P. Instantaneous signal loss simulation (InSiL): an improved algorithm for myocardial T(1) mapping using the MOLLI sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41(3):721-729. cited by applicant
Shao J, Rapacchi S, Nguyen KL, Hu P. Myocardial T1 mapping at 3.0 tesla using an inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo readout and bloch equation simulation with slice profile correction (Blesspc) T1 estimation algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;43(2):414-425. cited by applicant
Simonyan, Karen, and Andrew Zisserman. “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014). cited by applicant
Sussman MS, Wintersperger BJ. Modified look-locker inversion recovery (Molli) T1 mapping with inversion group (IG) fitting—A method for improved precision. Magn Reson Imaging 2019;62:38-45. cited by applicant
Sussman MS, Yang IY, Fok KH, Wintersperger BJ. Inversion group (IG) fitting: A new T1 mapping method for modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) that allows arbitrary inversion groupings and rest periods (including no rest period). Magn Reson Med 2016;75(6):2332-2340. cited by applicant
Taylor A J, Salerno M, Dharmakumar R and Jerosch-Herold M (2016) T1 mapping: basic techniques and clinical applications JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 9 67-81. cited by applicant
Ugander M, Oki A J, Hsu L-Y, Kellman P, Greiser A, Aletras A H, Sibley C T, Chen M Y, Bandettini WP and Arai A E 2012 Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology European heart journal 33 1268-78. cited by applicant
Weingärtner S, Akçakaya M, Basha T, et al. Combined saturation/inversion recovery sequences for improved evaluation of scar and diffuse fibrosis in patients with arrhythmia or heart rate variability. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;71:1024-1034. cited by applicant
Weingartner S, Akcakaya M, Roujol S, Basha T, Stehning C, Kissinger KV, Goddu B, Berg S, Manning WJ, Nezafat R. Free-breathing post-contrast three-dimensional T1 mapping: Volumetric assessment of myocardial T1 values. Magn Reson Med 2015;73(1):214-222. cited by applicant
Weingartner S, Akcakaya M, Roujol S, Basha T, Tschabrunn C, Berg S, Anter E, Nezafat R. Free-breathing combined three-dimensional phase sensitive late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping for myocardial tissue characterization. Magn Reson Med 2015;74(4):1032-1041. cited by applicant
Weingartner S, Messner NM, Budjan J, Lossnitzer D, Mattler U, Papavassiliu T, Zollner FG, Schad LR. Myocardial T1- mapping at 3T using saturation-recovery: reference values, precision and comparison with Molli. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016;18(84). cited by applicant
Weingartner S, Roujol S, Akcakaya M, Basha TA, Nezafat R. Free-breathing multislice native myocardial T1 mapping using the slice-interleaved T1 (Stone) sequence. Magn Reson Med 2014;74(1):115-124. cited by applicant
Xanthis CG, Bidhult S, Greiser A, et al. Simulation-based quantification of native T1 and T2 of the myocardium using a modified MOLLI scheme and the importance of Magnetization Transfer. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:96-106. cited by applicant
Xue H, Greiser A, Zuehlsdorff S, Jolly M-P, Guehring J, Arai AE, Kellman P. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for myocardial T1 mapping with motion correction and parametric fitting. Magn Reson Med 2013;69(5):1408-1420. cited by applicant
Xue H, Shah S, Greiser A, Guetter C, Littmann A, Jolly MP, Arai AE, Zuehlsdorff S, Guehring J, Kellman P. Motion correction for myocardial T1 mapping using image registration with synthetic image estimation. Magn Reson Med 2012;67(6):1644-1655. cited by applicant
Zhang Q, Hann E, Werys K, et al. Deep learning with attention supervision for automated motion artefact detection in quality control of cardiac T1-mapping. Artif. Intell. Med. 2020;110. cited by applicant
Zhang Q, Su P, Chen Z, Liao Y, Chen S, Guo R, Qi H, Li X, Zhang X, Hu Z, Lu H, Chen H. Deep learning-based MR fingerprinting ASL ReconStruction (DeepMARS). Magn Reson Med 2020;84(2):1024-1034. cited by applicant
Zhu Y, Fahmy AS, Duan C, Nakamori S, Nezafat R. Automated myocardial T2 and extracellular vol. quantification in cardiac MRI using transfer learning-based myocardium segmentation. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence 2020;2(1):e190034. cited by applicant
Zhu Y, Kang J, Duan C, Nezafat M, Neisius U, Jang J, Nezafat R. Integrated motion correction and dictionary learning for free-breathing myocardial T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med 2019;81(4):2644-2654. cited by applicant
Aggarwal R, Sounderajah V, Martin G, Ting D S, Karthikesalingam A, King D, Ashrafian H and Darzi A (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis NPJ digital medicine 4 1-23. cited by applicant
Akçakaya M, Basha TA, Weingärtner S, Roujol S, Berg S, Nezafat R. Improved quantitative myocardial T2 mapping: Impact of the fitting model. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;74:93-105. cited by applicant
Akcakaya M, Weingartner S, Basha TA, Roujol S, Bellm S, Nezafat R. Joint myocardial T1 and T2 mapping using a combination of saturation recovery and T2 -preparation. Magn Reson Med 2016;76(3):888-896. cited by applicant
Akcakaya M, Weingartner S, Roujol S, Nezafat R. On the selection of sampling points for myocardial T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med 2015;73(5):1741-1753. cited by applicant
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Ime4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015;67:1-48. cited by applicant
Becker KM, Blaszczyk E, Funk S, et al. Fast myocardial T1 mapping using cardiac motion correction. Magn. Reson. Med. 2020;83:438-451. cited by applicant
Blume U, Lockie T, Stehning C, Sinclair S, Uribe S, Razavi R, Schaeffter T. Interleaved T1 and T2 relaxation time mapping for cardiac applications. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2009;29(2):480-487. cited by applicant
Bush MA, Ahmad R, Jin N, Liu Y, Simonetti OP. Patient specific prospective respiratory motion correction for efficient, free-breathing cardiovascular MRI. Magn Reson Med 2019;81(6):3662-3674. cited by applicant
Bush MA, Pan Y, Jin N, et al. Prospective correction of patient-specific respiratory motion in myocardial T1 and T2 mapping. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021;85:855-867. cited by applicant
Captur G, et al., Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , A T1 and ECV phantom for global T1 mapping quality assurance: The T1 mapping and ECV standardisation in Cmr (T1MES) program, 2016, 18(Suppl 1):W14. cited by applicant
Captur G, Gatehouse P, Keenan KE, Heslinga F G, Bruehl R, Prothmann M, Graves M J, Eames R J, Torlasco C, Benedetti G, Donovan J, Ittermann B, Boubertakh R, Bathgate A, Royet C, Pang W, Nezafat R, Salerno M, Kellman P and Moon J C (2016b) A medical device-grade T1 and ECV phantom for global T1 mapping quality assurance-the T1 Mapping and ECV Standardization in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (T1MES) program Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 18 58. cited by applicant
Captur G, Gatehouse P, Keenan KE, Heslinga FG, Bruehl R, Prothmann M, Graves MJ, Eames RJ, Torlasco C, Benedetti G, Donovan J, Ittermann B, Boubertakh R, Bathgate A, Royet C, Pang W, Nezafat R, Salerno M, Kellman P, Moon JC. A medical device-grade T1 and ECV phantom for global T1 mapping quality assurance-the T1 Mapping and ECV Standardization in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (T1MES) program. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016; 18(1):58. cited by applicant
Captur G, Manisty C, Moon JC. Cardiac MRI evaluation of myocardial disease. Heart 2016; 102(18):1429-1435. cited by applicant
Chow K, Flewitt J, Pagano JJ, Green JD, Friedrich MG, Thompson RB. T2-dependent errors in Molli T1 values: simulations, phantoms, and in-vivo studies. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14(Suppl 1):P281. cited by applicant
Chow K, Flewitt JA, Green JD, Pagano JJ, Friedrich MG, Thompson RB. Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(6):2082-2095. cited by applicant
Chow K, Yang Y, Shaw P, Kramer CM, Salerno M. Robust free-breathing Sasha T1 mapping with high-contrast image registration. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016; 18(1):47. cited by applicant
Christodoulou AG, Shaw JL, Nguyen C, Yang Q, Xie Y, Wang N, Li D. Magnetic resonance multitasking for motion- resolved quantitative cardiovascular imaging. Nature Biomedical Engineering 2018;2(4):215-226. cited by applicant
Cohen O, Zhu B, Rosen Ms. Mr fingerprinting Deep Reconstruction NEtwork (DRONE). Magn Reson Med 2018;80(3):885-894. cited by applicant
D'Errico L, Sussman MS, Hanneman K, Wintersperger BJ. Precision-optimized single protocol pre-/post-contrast modified-look locker inversion T1 mapping using composite inversion group fitting. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;74:195-202. cited by applicant
Diakogiannis F I, Waldner F, Caccetta P and Wu C (2020) ResUNet-a: A deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing 162 94-114. cited by applicant
Doneva M, Börnert P, Eggers H, Stehning C, Senegas J, Mertins A. Compressed sensing reconstruction for magnetic resonance parameter mapping. Magn Reson Med 2010;64(4):1114-1120. cited by applicant
El-Rewaidy H, Guo R, Paskavitz A, Yankama T, Ngo L, Menze B and Nezafat R (2021) MyoMapNet: Accelerated Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery Myocardial T1 Mapping via Neural Networks arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.00143. cited by applicant
El-Rewaidy H, Nezafat M, Jang J, Nakamori S, Fahmy AS, Nezafat R. Nonrigid active shape model-based registration framework for motion correction of cardiac T1 mapping. Magn Reson Med 2018;80(2):780-791. cited by applicant
Fahmy A S, El-Rewaidy H, Nezafat M, Nakamori S and Nezafat R (2019) Automated analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial native T1 mapping images using fully convolutional neural networks Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 21 7. cited by applicant
Fahmy A S, Neisius U, Chan R H, Rowin E J, Manning W J, Maron M S and Nezafat R (2020) Three-dimensional deep convolutional neural networks for automated myocardial scar quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multicenter multivendor study Radiology 294 52-60. cited by applicant
Fitts M, Breton E, Kholmovski EG, et al. Arrhythmia insensitive rapid cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequence. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;70:1274-1282. cited by applicant
Gai ND, Stehning C, Nacif M, Bluemke DA. Modified Look-Locker T1 evaluation using Bloch simulations: human and phantom validation. Magn Reson Med 2013;69(2):329-336. cited by applicant
Gatsoni O, Aletras AH, Heiberg E, Berggran K. T1 Mapping By Means Of Deep Learning Neural Networks Using Both Saturation Recovery and Inversion Recovery Data. In: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR). Orlando, FL; 2020. cited by applicant
Guo et al., “Accelerated cardiac T1 mapping infour heartbeats withinline MyoMapNet: adeep learning-based T1 estimation approach,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (2022) 24:6. cited by applicant
Guo R, Cai X, Kucukseymen S, et al. Free-breathing simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping with whole left ventricle coverage. Magn. Reson. Med. 2020;85. cited by applicant
Guo R, Cai X, Kucukseymen S, et al. Free-breathing whole-heart multi-slice myocardial T1 mapping in 2 minutes. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021;85:89-102. cited by applicant
Guo R, Chen Z, Herzka DA, Luo J, Ding H. A three-dimensional free-breathing sequence for simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81:1031-1043. cited by applicant
Guo R, Chen Z, Wang Y, Herzka DA, Luo J, Ding H. Three-dimensional free breathing whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping at 3 T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018;20(1):64. cited by applicant
Haaf P, Garg P, Messroghli D R, Broadbent D A, Greenwood J P and Plein S (2017) Cardiac T1 mapping and extracellular volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 18 1-12. cited by applicant
Hamilton JI, Currey D, Rajagopalan S, Seiberlich N. Deep learning reconstruction for cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting T1 and T2 mapping. Magn Reson Med 2021;85(4):2127-2135. cited by applicant
Hamilton JI, Jiang Y, Chen Y, et al. MR fingerprinting for rapid quantification of myocardial T1, T2, and proton spin density. Magn. Reson. Med. 2017;77:1446-1458. cited by applicant
Hann E, Popescu I A, Zhang Q, Gonzales R A, Barutcu A, Neubauer S, Ferreira V M and Piechnik S K (2021) Deep neural network ensemble for on-the-fly quality control-driven segmentation of cardiac MRI T1 mapping Medical image analysis 71 102029. cited by applicant
He K, Zhang X, Ren S and Sun J InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, (2016a), vol. Series): InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition) pp. 770-778. cited by applicant
Higgins DM, Ridgway JP, Radjenovic A, Sivananthan UM, Smith MA. T1 measurement using a short acquisition period for quantitative cardiac applications. Medical physics 2005;32(6):1738-1746. cited by applicant
Hirra I, Ahmad M, Hussain A, Ashraf M U, Saeed I A, Qadri S F, Alghamdi A M and Alfakeeh A S (2021) Breast Cancer Classification From Histopathological Images Using Patch-Based Deep Learning Modeling IEEE Access 9 24273-87. cited by applicant
Inati SJ, Naegele JD, Zwart NR, Roopchansingh V, Lizak MJ, Hansen DC, Liu CY, Atkinson D, Kellman P, Kozerke S, Xue H, Campbell-Washburn AE, Sørensen TS, Hansen Ms. ISMRM Raw data format: A proposed standard for MRI raw datasets. Magn Reson Med 2017;77(1):411-421. cited by applicant
Jaubert O, Cruz G, Bustin A, et al. Free-running cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Joint T1/T2 map and Cine imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;68:173-182. cited by applicant
Jun Y, Shin H, Eo T, Kim T and Hwang D (2021) Deep model-based magnetic resonance parameter mapping network (Dopamine) for fast T1 mapping using variable flip angle method Medical image analysis 70 102017. cited by applicant
Kellman P and Hansen M S (2014) T1-mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 16 1-20. cited by applicant
Kellman P, Arai AE, Xue H. T1 and extracellular vol. mapping in the heart: Estimation of error maps and the influence of noise on precision. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2013;15:56. cited by applicant
Kellman P, Herzka DA, Arai AE, Hansen MS. Influence of Off-resonance in myocardial T1-mapping using SSFP based MOLLI method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15(1):63. cited by applicant
Kellman P, Herzka DA, Hansen MS. Adiabatic Inversion Pulses for Myocardial T1 Mapping. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(4):1428-1434. cited by applicant
Kellman P, Wilson JR, Xue H, Ugander M, Arai AE. Extracellular vol. fraction mapping in the myocardium, part 1: evaluation of an automated method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14(63). cited by applicant

edspgr.12181554